1. Reminder: Please user our affiliate links to get to your favorite stores for holiday shopping!

Help with tele lens decision.

Discussion in 'Olympus Cameras' started by RobertS, Jun 1, 2013.

  1. RobertS

    RobertS Mu-43 Regular

    Feb 28, 2011
    I'm interested in getting a lens with a little more reach than my Oly 40-150mm lens on my E-PL2. Looks like the options are : Oly 75-300mm, Panasonic 45-200mm, or Panny 100-300mm. But I'm also concerned with the overall IQ of such a lens, and am pretty happy with that of my current 40-150mm.
    In your opinion(s), which of these other 3 lenses would offer me quality AND increased tele range, equal to, or better than, my 40-150mm?
    Thanks for your thoughts.
  2. RevBob

    RevBob Super Moderator

    Jun 4, 2011
    NorthWestern PA
    I can't comment on the other two but I own the Panasonic 100-300 and it's an amazing lens. I just spent the day shooting a disc golf tournament and that's the lens I used most of the time. Sharp, excellent color and superb IQ. I love this lens! :thumbup:
  3. RobertS

    RobertS Mu-43 Regular

    Feb 28, 2011
    Thanks RevBob,

    Might I ask which camera(s) you use for this lens?
  4. RobertS

    RobertS Mu-43 Regular

    Feb 28, 2011
    I know it's next to impossible to find anyone who has experience with all 4 of these lenses, but if you've used even 2 of them, or maybe merely researched a couple of them and made some sort of decision, I'd like to hear your thoughts.
    Like I said IQ is the top concern......even over my quest for more focal range. I'd rather have a shorter, but more highly regarded shorter ranged lens, than have to compromise on the quality of the longer end of one of the longer teles.
  5. Steven

    Steven Mu-43 All-Pro

    May 25, 2012
    What camera do you have? If Panasonic then you are limited to Panasonic lenses for their OIS. I wouldnt bother with 45-200, not much more reach .
    Don't have either of other 2 but I understand they are about same optically. U
  6. Fmrvette

    Fmrvette This Space For Rent

    May 26, 2012
    Detroit, Michigan

    I've got the Olympus 40-150mm and the Panasonic 45-200mm, and there have been a few threads on IQ comparisons between the two that generally give the Olympus a slight edge in image quality. If image quality is your major criterion I would forgo the Panasonic 45-200mm because you already have the Olympus 40-150mm.

    I'm using the lenses primarily on an OM-D EM-5, less frequently an Olympus EPL-1 and find them very close. I prefer the Panasonic because of it's extra reach.

    I would suggest that you research the Olympus 75-300 and the Panasonic 100-300.

    Unfortunately I do not own either of those lenses, and so am unqualified to furnish information on them (other than by hearsay).


  7. quatchi

    quatchi Mu-43 Veteran

    May 17, 2012
    Munich, Germany
    I have the Oly 75-300 and had the Pana 45-200. In case you are not on a tight budget, I would dismiss the 45-200. At least in the 150-200 range, the Pana is getting weak and the Oly is superior. As the Pana 100-300 is supposed to be of similar quality to the Oly I would get one of those two lenses.

    In this post, there is a comparison shot between the Oly 75-300 and Pana 45-200.
  8. Geoff3DMN

    Geoff3DMN Mu-43 Veteran

    I have the Oly 75-300 and I tried the Panny 100-300, the reasons I bought the Oly were it's lighter and smaller than the Panasonic but If I had a G5 instead of an OMD I'd have bought the 100-300.

    Honestly I don't think either is a bad lens.
  9. elj4176

    elj4176 Mu-43 Regular

    Mar 23, 2012
    I have the 40-150 and the new 75-300. I previously rented the first version of 75-300 and it is a great lens. Not fast but very sharp. If you will be shooting with plenty of light then that won't be an issue.

    I think I posted some snaps from my trip to The Wilds with the 75-300 in the lens forum.