SOme other observations:
I would think the "52" is not the year. WOuld be no reason to have wrote the year without more of a date. My first thought was it is the negative number or proof number (but, ah, um negative number on a roll of film dont go that high , do they?). I suspect that is maybe the client number.
I dont understand the "Glenview 4=45-46" in the rubber stamp.
But I can say that stating the city (next line) as "Glenview, Ill." no zip code, not two letter abbreviation, indicates to me tht the rubber stamp to be made prior to, or shortly after, 1964 when zip codes were started to be used.
THe shape and mullions of the windows are fairly common in old churches.
But the building pictured in post 25 sure is a good match of the brick/stone work. Amazing........
I would think if that photographer was a part time guy, he might be more likley to go some distance to relatives or friends of the familys weddings, more so than a large studio, anyway.
I would think there would be good chance the bride and the owner of photo might have little relationship to the original owner (1891) of the book.
If you are on FaceBook, maybe see if you can find some local group for that city, join it, and post there.