1. Reminder: Please use our affiliate links for holiday shopping!

Have 12-40mm... should I get 12mm F2?

Discussion in 'Native Lenses' started by kunid, Mar 27, 2014.

  1. kunid

    kunid New to Mu-43

    2
    Mar 27, 2014
    I have recently bought a E-M1 and 12-40mm f/2.8, 60mm f/2.8 Macro and 75mm f/1.8.

    I'm wondering whether I should add a 12mm f/2.0 ahead of a trip I'm going on next month to Chile... I'm expecting to take a lot of landscapes and would like to do some astrophotography... do you think that the 12-40mm f/2.8 @ 12mm f/2.8 will be ok?

    There doesn't appear to be many wide fast options. :(

    The Panasonic 15mm f/1.7 looks interesting but not available yet.
     
  2. nuclearboy

    nuclearboy Mu-43 Top Veteran

    850
    Jan 28, 2011
    USA
    I don't think you typically need f2 over f2.8 for landscapes or astrophotography. The zoom should be all you need unless you know you will need a little more light. I would think shooting the landscapes at f4 or f5.6 may be more ideal.
     
  3. Wisertime

    Wisertime Mu-43 All-Pro

    Aug 6, 2013
    Philly
    Steve
  4. walter_j

    walter_j Mu-43 Veteran

    364
    Sep 10, 2013
    Hagwilget, B.C., Canada
    Walter
    I don't think so. Maybe the lens cap fish eye. The lighter your kit the better i'd think.
     
  5. silver92b

    silver92b Mu-43 All-Pro

    Feb 7, 2013
    Atlanta, GA
    Landscapes should not need fast lenses. There is almost always plenty of light for landscape photography and if not, there is always the tripod option. I would get a wide angle lens like the Zuiko 9-18mm or similar. The 12-40 f2.8 is insignificantly slower than the 12mmf2 for landscape shots. I would be more concerned about the wider field of view.
     
  6. LowTEC

    LowTEC Mu-43 Regular

    I personally have never shot any landscape@ 2.8 let alone f2. I mostly use 5.6 and up to f13 for long exposure effect. The only time I can think if that one can benefit f2 is shooting stars in pitch black
     
  7. Canonista

    Canonista Mu-43 Top Veteran

    563
    Sep 3, 2011
    L.A.
    Get/bring a quality travel tripod instead.
     
  8. kunid

    kunid New to Mu-43

    2
    Mar 27, 2014
    Thanks for the feedback. The main reason I was even considering the 12mm primes was for astrophotography (I can't bring myself to shell out £400 for a sky tracker)

    I have a travel tripod (Manfrotto Befree).

    Looking at ultra-wide zooms- Oly M.Zuiko 9-18mm (£415 new) and the Panasonic 7-14mm f/4 (£600 new).

    The Pansonic looks interesting, although I have read there are some strange purple flares with Oly OMD bodies - should I avoid it?
     
  9. xdayv

    xdayv Color Blind

    Aug 26, 2011
    Tacloban City, Philippines
    Dave
    F/2 max aperture might benefit from astrophotography... but having said that, I think the 12mm F2 shines most for street photography at lowlight / night.

    If I have 12-40, I might add the 7-14 for landscapes. YMMV.
     
  10. xdayv

    xdayv Color Blind

    Aug 26, 2011
    Tacloban City, Philippines
    Dave
    F/2 max aperture might benefit from astrophotography... but having said that, I think the 12mm F2 shines most for street photography at lowlight / night.

    If I have 12-40, I might add the 7-14 for landscapes. YMMV.
     
  11. nardoleo

    nardoleo Mu-43 Veteran

    332
    Apr 2, 2013
    Singapore
    Leo
    For landscape photography, the 12-40mm is more than enough. I dont think you will need the extra speed from the 12mm f2.

    I personally used the 12mm prime when I want a smaller setup or foresee that I wil be doing mostly night or indoor shoot. Thats when the f2 comes in really handy. The prime is really sharp wide open and renders really nicely.

    Sent from my GT-N7105 using Mu-43 mobile app
     
    • Like Like x 1
  12. mcasan

    mcasan Mu-43 All-Pro

    Feb 26, 2014
    Atlanta
    Get a good CPL like the B+W Kaesemann MRC for the 12-40 and put a good ballhead and legs under it all.