Has anyone bought the RX-10 to replace some of their mu-43 lenses/bodies?

penfan2010

Mu-43 All-Pro
Joined
Nov 12, 2010
Messages
1,098
Location
NJ, USA
I've been debating whether or not to sell off some lenses and a body to simplify my mu-43 gear, and then just buy an RX-10. I am specifically thinking of unloading my E-M5 and potentially the Panny 14-140 and 35-100 F2.8. I use the 14-140 a lot for walk around photos when I need the wide FOV range, and the 35-100 for shots of my son's marching band performances and stage concerts (which are seasonal, and therefore not sure they justify having such an expensive lens on hand). I would keep the GX-7 for shooting with primes and my legacy MF lenses, as well as the 12-35mm F2.8 which I use quite a bit and find to be very sharp. I would also keep the GM-1 and kit zoom for poortability. Any thoughts from real world users of the RX-10 are appreciated.
 

rezatravilla

Mu-43 All-Pro
Joined
Aug 7, 2013
Messages
1,019
Location
Indonesia
Real Name
Reza Travilla
Hmmm i also think similar with you but to replace my Sony NEX 5n with Sony RX100. Will keep my EM5 though.
 
Joined
Apr 11, 2009
Messages
475
Location
Tempe, AZ
Real Name
Rick
I bought an RX-10 as an alternative to expanding m43 outfit. I'm happy with it, and a great lens and image quality. Yes, I've heard all the reasons why this "makes no sense", etc, but for me it works. Nice to not have to decide about which body/lens/etc, just garb it and you're pretty much covered: very good video, excellent quality stills, a pleasure to use. Nothing is without its drawbacks, It just works for me. Check out some of the posts about it on Kirk Tuck's Visual Science Lab, Uwe Steinmuller at outback photo, etc.
 

penfan2010

Mu-43 All-Pro
Joined
Nov 12, 2010
Messages
1,098
Location
NJ, USA
Thanks, Rick. I'm a regular reader of Kirk's blog, and interesting to see how he's moved fully to all mu43+ the RX10. Also read the Luminous Landscape review and Ming Thein's perspective. Will check out Uwe's article. Glad to hear your personal experience has been good
 

dougjgreen

Mu-43 All-Pro
Joined
Jun 5, 2013
Messages
1,864
Location
San Diego
Real Name
Doug Green
If it was a $700-800 camera, I might have bought it. At well over $1000, I'll pass.
 

val

Mu-43 Top Veteran
Joined
Dec 19, 2013
Messages
548
Location
Australia
Real Name
William
If it was a $700-800 camera, I might have bought it. At well over $1000, I'll pass.
That's the biggest problem, it has such great tech in it but the only reason why I wouldn't get it over a m43 is for primes, I love my 25mm f1.4 and while the RX10 ticks so many boxes and I think it would be perfect for casual videographers it would be a easier pill to swallow if it was a bit cheaper.
 

penfan2010

Mu-43 All-Pro
Joined
Nov 12, 2010
Messages
1,098
Location
NJ, USA
thanks. In this case I would sell the Panny 35-100 and a few other things to fund the RX-10, if I did go that route. So, the goal is to make the switch on a cost-neutral basis.
 

penfan2010

Mu-43 All-Pro
Joined
Nov 12, 2010
Messages
1,098
Location
NJ, USA
Thanks for the perspective from various folks on the forum. After more research, and the discovery of a sub$1K LNIB variant, I sprung for the RX-10. I sold off the Panny 35-100 F2.8 and Olympus 12mm F2.0 to help fund the purchase, and have no regrets. I am unloading another body and zoom, and, based on my tests today, may sell off a few more items in my m43 kit. Posted the image below with my GM-1 in another post; this is going to make a great travel combo, methinks.

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


A few from the RX-10 below, the first two at ISO 3200, the rest at ISO 200 but with the Clear digital zoom racked up to 2x setting in a few cases (nice to have a 400mm equiv with max. aperture of F2.8).

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)
 
Joined
Oct 2, 2013
Messages
7,878
Location
Pittsburgh, PA
Real Name
Ian
Does the clear digital zoom feature work when shooting raws at the largest file size? For instance, i can use the 2x zoom on my Panasonic cameras, but in jpeg only, and with a largest file size of M instead of L.

Also, how do you find the zoom speed of the lens when you're taking photographs?
 

PatrickNSF

Mu-43 Regular
Joined
Sep 30, 2011
Messages
119
Location
San Francisco, CA
Real Name
Patrick
I purchased the RX10 when it was released last fall, but sold it when I migrated back to m43rds this spring. Although the lens is great, and I'm satisfied with the quality of the sensor – I've had the original RX100 since its release nearly two years ago – I found it frustrating to use. Focus speed was a bit "off" – not as fast as the RX100 nor my OMDs. Worse was the zoom mechanism. It's very slow to use. Depending on your shooting style, it could be problematic. If possible, I'd give it a good, extended try at a store before committing to a purchase.

Another issue to keep an eye on is focus point selection. With the Sonys, it's a two (if not three) step process to move the focus point around. Again, depending on your shooting style, it can become a frustrating camera to use. But if you can live with it's operational limitations, the image quality can be very good.
 
Joined
May 28, 2011
Messages
44
Location
New Mexico, USA
RX10 + M4/3?

I've been using a Sony RX10 along with my Olympus E-M5 since December. I'm also impressed with the flexibility and image quality of the RX10. It's often difficult to tell the difference between the two cameras (with the usual disclaimers of not pixel peeping and not printing very large). The the E-M5 is obviously better in low light but I've been surprised at how capable the RX10 is. It has an auto mode that in low light takes three photos and blends them in a way that retains good sharpness while minimizing noise. There are examples of low light shots in the flickr links below.

It's true that there are some ergonomic issues with the RX10, including the slow zoom, but what camera doesn't have limitations? I think that it is a better urban camera than it is for landscapes and that it is not capable of handling fast motion. But, overall, especially as a travel camera, I think it's a camera worth considering

A good travel combination could be the RX10 with its wide focal range and flexibility plus the Olympus with some primes.


Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)



Here's links to some more examples. I'm sure if you look hard enough you can determine that the RX10 is an excellent camera or, if you prefer, a limited camera with poor image quality

http://www.pbase.com/tconelly/santafe_albuquerque (last set of shots of heritage farm compares E-M5 + 12-40 vs. RX10)

https://www.flickr.com/photos/99341985@N05/sets/72157639628246064/

https://www.flickr.com/photos/99341985@N05/sets/72157638482125776/
 

penfan2010

Mu-43 All-Pro
Joined
Nov 12, 2010
Messages
1,098
Location
NJ, USA
Clearzoom is also limited to JPG, it seems. Just tried it on RAW and got as far as the maximum optical tele end only. Zooming is a bit slow, but not bad for general shooting in still (two speeds, one using zoom ring on lens is slow, the toggle around the shutter release button seems faster). On video, the zooming is dramatically slower as I am sure you've read in other reviews.
 

penfan2010

Mu-43 All-Pro
Joined
Nov 12, 2010
Messages
1,098
Location
NJ, USA
to me ... pics are not convincing ...just saying

but the gm1 is so cute with pancake
Subjectively, the RX-10 images match up with my old E-PL3 (certainly would not be as sharp as the sensor on my E-M5 and GX-7), but the color and quality is great for my purposes.
 

penfan2010

Mu-43 All-Pro
Joined
Nov 12, 2010
Messages
1,098
Location
NJ, USA
I purchased the RX10 when it was released last fall, but sold it when I migrated back to m43rds this spring. Although the lens is great, and I'm satisfied with the quality of the sensor – I've had the original RX100 since its release nearly two years ago – I found it frustrating to use. Focus speed was a bit "off" – not as fast as the RX100 nor my OMDs. Worse was the zoom mechanism. It's very slow to use. Depending on your shooting style, it could be problematic. If possible, I'd give it a good, extended try at a store before committing to a purchase.

Another issue to keep an eye on is focus point selection. With the Sonys, it's a two (if not three) step process to move the focus point around. Again, depending on your shooting style, it can become a frustrating camera to use. But if you can live with it's operational limitations, the image quality can be very good.
Thanks, have only started to use the RX-10, and in the limited situations I've used it, have not found AF to be an issue. For most other cases, I've still got my E-M5, GX-7 as well as the GM-1 and an assortment of m43 lenses, so am covered for many other situations. Debating whether I should now sell the E-M5 and the Panny 14-140…..but I love my E-M5 too much.
 

PatrickNSF

Mu-43 Regular
Joined
Sep 30, 2011
Messages
119
Location
San Francisco, CA
Real Name
Patrick
It took me a bit of time before coming up against the RX10 operational issues that I couldn't work with, but image quality and features (e.g., video) were good. I'm still planning to hold on to my well-worn RX100 (especial for video), but find the E-M1/E-M10 with the Oly 14-150 and/or 14-42 EZ, coupled with a prime or two, makes for a better travel system for me. Maybe just give it a longer period of time and see how things shake out in a month or two. From my own experience, in the past I've sold old equipment assuming something new would fit my needs better and it hasn't always been the case.
 

GFFPhoto

Mu-43 All-Pro
Joined
Feb 24, 2013
Messages
1,793
I think about stuff like this sometimes. I would kind of like to get a Ricoh GR, but the PL15 is coming out at about the same price (the GR is a fixed 28mm equivalent). Even though these different cameras can have some very clear advantages (the GR is tiny compared to ANY of my 43 bodies, and might have better IQ), does anybody else get hung up on the fact that cameras depreciate much faster than lenses?
 

penfan2010

Mu-43 All-Pro
Joined
Nov 12, 2010
Messages
1,098
Location
NJ, USA
It is an unfortunate reality. Even in the film days, good lenses held their value, while bodies tended to depreciate faster. My observation in the digital world is that the cameras with unique features, or which are not upgraded as often, tend to keep their value longer. Used models of the Fuji X100 (original), or the X-Pro 1, seem to have depreciated less quickly than the various Olympus Pens and Panasonic iterations. Then there are the Leica Ms, but those are another category all together.
 

Latest posts

Links on this page may be to our affiliates. Sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
Mu-43 is a fan site and not associated with Olympus, Panasonic, or other manufacturers mentioned on this site.
Forum post reactions by Twemoji: https://github.com/twitter/twemoji
Copyright © 2009-2019 Amin Forums, LLC
Top Bottom