Handheld HDR tries and walk around Jersey City

Discussion in 'Scenic, Architecture, and Travel' started by zettapixel, Jul 14, 2011.

  1. zettapixel

    zettapixel Mu-43 Veteran

    470
    Aug 12, 2010
    NY
    I guess one lesson I learned from it is (which should've been obvious anyway) - no sense in having running water in multi-shot HDR.
    I also tried to compare Photomatix 3 and Nik HDR Efex. I liked Photomatix controls a bit better, but IMHO Nik does a better job at de-ghosting aligned shots, so I ended up buying HDR Efex...
    All except the last 2 are with 9-18, the last 2 - Konica 57/1.4

    3 from Downtown NY

    This was with Photomatix, spent 40min on it, too tired to try Nik...

    p421548257-5.


    Nik.. wasn't able to remove nasty effect around the cloud (maybe will re-do the shot some day)

    [​IMG]


    Single shot HDR (Nik), multi-shot doesn't work well on water.
    p301817167-5.



    Stuff from Jersey City

    Single-shot HDR (Nik)

    p191226688-5.


    Mild single-shot HDR (Nik)

    p61448400-5.


    Non-HDR shots

    p271051119-4.


    Got lucky on this one - the wind calmed down for a couple of minutes and I was able to focus well

    p14859539-5.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  2. WT21

    WT21 Mu-43 Hall of Famer

    Feb 19, 2010
    Boston
    I rather like the water effect. Thanks for sharing.
     
  3. zettapixel

    zettapixel Mu-43 Veteran

    470
    Aug 12, 2010
    NY
    Thank you. Unfortunately, when I tried using HDR from multiple exposures (3, 1 stop bracketing) the less blurred water in the underexposed shots, having more details, interfered and the result was a mix of water from different shots - not very nice looking :frown:. Also, the fact that it can't really be aligned unless totally blurred doesn't help.