Is it an aqueduct and is it Roman? There are many architectures with rows of arches but it's usually water transport which puts an elevated grade over unpaved ground. However, a viaduct (Roman or otherwise) would also be built this way and aqueduct-viaduct widths don't seem to be necessarily distinguishable within the composition.
I'm a bit uncertain how to pursue a reasonably efficient search. While
ROMAQ indexes 1367 Roman aqueducts they're not queryable by location or by number of tiers, ROMAQ's geospatial data isn't open, and this could be post-Roman construction. Among the Greece adjacent countries (Albania, North Macedonia, Bulgaria, Turkey, Syria, Lebanon, Israel, Egypt, Libya, and Italy) all the image links in the
Turkey aqueduct map seem to be broken but I
think Albania, Macedonia, Bulgaria, Syria, Lebanon, Israel, Egypt, and Libya can be excluded within the
Roman aqueducts list. However, searches seem to really like to glom on to showy, multi-tier aqueducts in good condition. Many aqueducts are long enough they could have seldom photographed, less maintained, single tier sections which would probably receive low search rank even when one's got the right structure. So I'm unsure how much to trust an absence of matches.
