To start out: My name is Dan, and I have never owned a M43 camera. About 10 years ago, I started photography with a Nikon 35mm SLR (N90, I think it was?) As a poor high schooler, I only shot a dozen rolls before going bankrupt, so I sold it and switched to digital P&S's. I miss the quality, but other than the continuing costs of film, I like the portability of the small cameras. So...M43's have always been in my mind. I have preordered the GH2(/w 14-42) because I need good video recording as well, and the articulated screen is a must for filming and also the all too fun arm's reach candid shots. To maximize portability, I was ready to also order the 20mm 1.7 lens, when the GF1 (/w 20mm) price dropped to 599. The body only GF1 sell on ebay for 350-400+ lightly used, so I ordered that kit with the notion to keep the lens, sell the body, and be up as much as $100 vs. buying the 20mm separate at $320. After that too lenghty introduction (hoping to give perspective), I am now considering keeping both bodies: GF1 to for max portability and the GH2 for video and a little more muscle for stills. If I sell the GF1, I would put that cash into a longer lens to be decided later. My question: Is there enough of difference (both physical size and IQ) between the two bodies to justify keeping both? I appreciate any thoughts or ideas.