Gear Plateau?

dornblaser

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
Aug 13, 2012
Messages
3,385
Location
Chicago-area
Real Name
David Dornblaser
It looks like we hit a :43: gear plateau? With Panasonic's GM1, GX7 & GH4 and Olympus' E-M1, E-M10, E-P5 it does not look like there is a new body, with the exception of the E-PL7, due out this year. The lens roadmap for both companies has slowed to a trickle. 4/3rumors has more posts about non-:43: cameras than it does about :43: cameras recently. You have to leave the :43: world to read about the rumored X-PRO2 with its new 24 megapixel sensor to get excited about new mirrorless. The only thing that I am currently interested in* is whether the new rumored Panasonic fixed lens will have external aperture controls, etc., EVF, and, a 35mm equivalent FL to compete with the X100S. The new 15mm lens gives me hope. My B&H wish list is now almost empty. I suspect that we will have more threads about switching to another system as the year progresses.



* plus the never ending question of why Olympus won't fix their video.
 

GBarrington

Mu-43 Top Veteran
Joined
Apr 4, 2014
Messages
634
Location
Springfield, Illinois
There's a limit to just how many cameras people can buy. If the manufacturers feel we are in such a downturn, why put out models that they suspect will fail not on their lack of merit, but on the economy instead. It might be better to save your resources until circumstances are better.
 

Darren Bonner

Mu-43 All-Pro
Joined
May 1, 2013
Messages
1,084
Location
Poole UK
I've got all the lenses that I want and need, maybe at the beginning of next year, I might sell my G5 and E-PL5 and purchase a GX7. I would be happy with that and the GM1. I use to lust after the X100, I bought the Fuji XF1, it was alright, but I soon sold it, had a thing for a Ricoh GR, but since I bought the GM1, I'm no longer fussed with either of those two cameras.I have spent a lot on gear over the past couple of years and now I seem to be happy with my lot.
 

Jay86

Mu-43 Veteran
Joined
Dec 26, 2012
Messages
477
Personally dont care for any new camera releases from Oly or Panasonic until there is a significant image IQ gain to be had which is where I see the plateau from M43 camera's right now. Even then, can't upgrade every time a camera comes out and gain's half a stop of DR and ISO advantage if you know what I mean. As for lenses the system has really filled in nicely and it was bound to slow down. Really its the UWA and longer focal length ranges that need the attention now and I wouldnt mind seeing 3rd party companies jump in and start making natively designed M43 lenses to compete with Oly & Panasonic.
 
S

synthetictone

Guest
There comes a point when what you have does "well enough" and rather than buy new gear... we all should be looking at using that money to get us to better places with more photo ops to use that gear more. :wink:
 

agentlossing

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
Jun 26, 2013
Messages
4,200
Real Name
Andrew Lossing
I'll bet we would buy les cameras if we stalked online forums less ;) not that that's gonna stop me!
GX1•17/2.8•30/2.8
 

mattia

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
2,391
Location
The Netherlands
Honestly, we've been at an IQ plateau for years now; canon hasn't released a camera with a sensor hugely better than the 5DII, and the D800 is still king of the high megapixel crop. In mirrorless land, Sony's A7 series merely stuff that in a smaller package.

The only real breakthrough to be expected is better tracking AF.
 

RevBob

Super Moderator
Joined
Jun 4, 2011
Messages
4,545
Location
NorthWestern PA
Real Name
Bob
There were so many bodies released one after the other that prices fell quickly and the manufacturers were losing money. Delaying new releases keeps the prices up. I've been waiting for the E-P5 price to fall the way the E-P3 fell bit prices have levelled out. I love the E-P3 but I would like the improved sensor and 5 axis stabilization.
 

briloop

Mu-43 Regular
Joined
May 23, 2012
Messages
171
Location
Mount Juliet, TN
I suspect that we will have more threads about switching to another system as the year progresses.
I am looking into advanced compacts like the Sony RX100 III, Fuji x30, and Panasonic LX8. I switched to M43 for the smaller size. After owning two different M43 bodies over the last two years, I find that I really want something smaller than M43, something pocketable. If an advanced compact can deliver image quality that suits my needs, I am switching.
 

cmpatti

Mu-43 Veteran
Joined
May 8, 2011
Messages
263
Location
Berkeley, CA
I am looking into advanced compacts like the Sony RX100 III, Fuji x30, and Panasonic LX8. I switched to M43 for the smaller size. After owning two different M43 bodies over the last two years, I find that I really want something smaller than M43, something pocketable. If an advanced compact can deliver image quality that suits my needs, I am switching.
My mFT kit has stabilized, I think, and I'm quite satisfied with it, so I am not concerned that offerings have "plateaued." I am, however, also interested in an advanced compact, but not as a replacement for mFT. I want something that I can take anywhere (cycling, running, business travel) that is capable of making decent 15x20 inch prints. The RX100 III seems to be the most likely candidate, and I'm saving up for one.
 

John M Flores

Super Moderator
Joined
Jan 7, 2011
Messages
2,972
Location
NJ
I've actually hit a creativity plateau that no amount of gear can fix. That's one of the reasons I haven't purchased anything camera related this year. Zilch. Nada. Feels good and my bank account thanks me.
 

yumyum001

Mu-43 Rookie
Joined
Jul 5, 2012
Messages
11
There are only so many hours in a day, are you actually shooting for a living? If not, how are you having enough time to get to know the cameras you have inside out?

Just because I'm not able to afford so many cameras doesn't mean that there are people out there doing that. If you are able to and are having a blast doing that, then more power to you (I guess that's why people have their daily commute and weekend "fun" car right?)

Something to think about:

10 years down the road, are you going to care what camera / lens it was shot with? Will other people?

You will probably be thinking to yourself "Did I really made this picture with THAT camera?"

History tends to repeat itself, look at something you purchased 10+ years ago, how many of those items do you still have?

Moments that cherishes? Do you still remember or even care what it was captured with?


Sent from my iPhone using Mu-43
 

GBarrington

Mu-43 Top Veteran
Joined
Apr 4, 2014
Messages
634
Location
Springfield, Illinois
But what will happen to everyones GAS? it will be a disaster, actually I quite like that idea I had a Canon FD set for ten years till some **** stole it.
Well, this would have a positive impact on the consumer. In order to stay in business, the manufacturers would then have to concentrate on developing supporting system components that enhance the user experience of the cameras we do own. I, for one would like to see full auto macro bellows for the m43s lens mount, or a commitment of the 4/3s consortium of doubling or tripling the number of lenses available for the system in a variety of quality levels.

I recall back in my Canon FT-QL days, I had a special low light meter booster that connected to the built in light meter that allowed accurate metering down to an EV of -3.5 for iso (ASA actually) 100 film. At the time, it cost something like $50 US. (A huge amount in those days). http://www.mir.com.my/rb/photography/companies/canon/fdresources/ftql/

I'm not looking for that specific item, of course. But the having the manufacturers feeling the need to develop 'stuff' they can sell us besides the same camera with slightly different software would be really nice.
 

nstelemark

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
May 28, 2013
Messages
3,308
Location
Halifax, Nova Scotia Canada
Real Name
Larry
If anyone is bored with the m43 consortium announcements they just need to go back to Canon. The 7D MkII has been in the works for years. The 7D is five years old now? The Canon rumor site is a yawn fest.

How many bodies are current between Olympus and Panasonic? 8? All with essentially equivalent IQ? How many bodies do we need? They run from ultra tiny to small DSLR size with great options for stills and video. And lenses? There are close to 100 with duplicates and discontinued models.

I'm OK with a slower pace personally.
 

nstelemark

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
May 28, 2013
Messages
3,308
Location
Halifax, Nova Scotia Canada
Real Name
Larry
My mFT kit has stabilized, I think, and I'm quite satisfied with it, so I am not concerned that offerings have "plateaued." I am, however, also interested in an advanced compact, but not as a replacement for mFT. I want something that I can take anywhere (cycling, running, business travel) that is capable of making decent 15x20 inch prints. The RX100 III seems to be the most likely candidate, and I'm saving up for one.
The fixed lens Panasonic camera should be interesting.
 

alex66

Mu-43 All-Pro
Joined
Jul 23, 2010
Messages
1,487
Well, this would have a positive impact on the consumer. In order to stay in business, the manufacturers would then have to concentrate on developing supporting system components that enhance the user experience of the cameras we do own. I, for one would like to see full auto macro bellows for the m43s lens mount, or a commitment of the 4/3s consortium of doubling or tripling the number of lenses available for the system in a variety of quality levels.

I recall back in my Canon FT-QL days, I had a special low light meter booster that connected to the built in light meter that allowed accurate metering down to an EV of -3.5 for iso (ASA actually) 100 film. At the time, it cost something like $50 US. (A huge amount in those days). http://www.mir.com.my/rb/photography/companies/canon/fdresources/ftql/

I'm not looking for that specific item, of course. But the having the manufacturers feeling the need to develop 'stuff' they can sell us besides the same camera with slightly different software would be really nice.
I would agree with that pretty much, when I look back at the wealth of kit available for the OM1 or the Canon F1 it seems we have a lack of stuff. I still have the Canon lens book that came with my AE1p there was all sorts in there from fish eyes to mega telephoto lenses, the OM had superb macro options as I recall. I seem to remember that some of these things were more or less made to order though and I think some of the Canon offerings still are. It would be good if Olympus and Panasonic spent a year concentrating on new lenses, some exotics some high quality, ones that are needed by a fair few it seems like a 150-200mm fast prime. Then there are the useful to some extras such as bellows and micros coping gear. Mind you I have but one lens I can't get (can get near) that I would like, the rest of the system is perfect for me still want a 67.5mm 1.8 though.
 
D

Deleted member 20897

Guest
I'm so happy with the current Olympus OMD EM5, that I cannot see me needing to switch from that for a long time. The only thing that I can get excited about is when Olympus gets an OMD or EP that has PDAF capability for continuous focus that can keep up with my Nikon DSLRs.

Then, I'd be REALLY tempted to buy another body.

Right now, I like the lenses i have and am looking to add an Olympus 75-300 to round out the m43 kit.
 
Links on this page may be to our affiliates. Sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
Mu-43 is a fan site and not associated with Olympus, Panasonic, or other manufacturers mentioned on this site.
Forum post reactions by Twemoji: https://github.com/twitter/twemoji
Copyright © 2009-2019 Amin Forums, LLC
Top Bottom