- Aug 26, 2016
- Hampshire, UK
- Real Name
The Sony image looks more ‘processed’ in general to my eye. I don’t know if it’s caused by a subtle change in the angle of lighting but the colours appear a bit more vibrant? To be clear, I’m not meaning to imply that the photographer has done anything different between the two files.Thanks for the new side by side pics. Shows us a two stop difference in high ISO noise quality - 8000isoOLY vs 32000isoSony which is about right for FF
The Sony image appears like it’s had more aggressive sharpening, and not all positive. For example: the detail in the hair around the eye is better but there is apparent noise/sharpening artefacts in the small section of sofa visible in the enlarged view.
Either way, the differences are fairly minor and wouldn’t bother me unless I was printing huge.