I know on paper, the EPL5 has a better sensor, produces better high iso images, has a better DR than G5, blah, blah, blah. But I don't shoot on paper. Now there are some niggling things that I don't like, have never liked, about the PEN cameras: 1. No built in viewfinder. I simply hate the clip on viewfinder that Olympus offers. No matter how good it is, I hate it. There, I've said it. And while I'm at it, I do not like composing pictures by looking at the back of the camera either. If I want to do that I'll trade it all and take pictures with my telephone. 2. No fully articulating rear screen. I use the rear screen very little and I loved how, on my GH2, it simply turned around as if it was not even there. With the EPL5 I have to always be mindful it is there. I don't want to be afraid of breaking a part of the camera I don't even use! The G5 has both but would I be as happy with the images it produces as I am with those produced with the EPL5? For those of you who have both or have shot both, help a brother out. If I trade the EPL5 for a G5, will my life be pure bliss?