Some quick background details, I've not really been that into photography until the last year or so. I only really used to take snaps while on holiday, and flying low cost means that lugging heavy DSLR's was pretty much out of the question. My girlfriend bought a GF3 with the 14mm / 14-42mm kit lenses, and the improvement over travelzoom's has been great. A bit later I purchased a 45-200mm (still being stuck in the "I need at least 12x zoom!" phase I guess?), and while I like it I've been thinking of getting rid of it. That brings me to my main question, we're planning a big holiday later this year and I have a few hundred pounds here as a budget to improve our little kit. I had been thinking of getting a G3 myself, mainly for the EVF, the swivel-screen for video / selfshots and the improved sensor / ISO performance. Recently I've been very tempted to skip getting my own camera and invest in a PL25, as I sometimes found the 14mm too wide and the kit lens lacks that super crispness the pancake and the 45-200 have. I've looked at the 20mm as it's about 1/2 of the price of a 25mm here in the UK, but the slow AF and the distortion for portrait shots are putting me off a bit. What should give me the biggest upgrade of the two? I'm a bit wary of spending upwards of £400 on one lens without being able to test it (it's never in stock anywhere in retail!), but the results in reviews seem amazing. Would I still be able to get similar details with "just" a GF3?