Discussion in 'This or That?' started by photoheron, Jun 25, 2013.
Is Fuji, a viable option when looking at cameras with the 4/3 ?
It's certainly a viable alternative to mFT (along, for example, with Sony NEX). There are many threads and web site reviews discussing the pro's and cons of the competing systems.
i tried both the X-E1 and the OM-D and for me, the Fuji is a great alternative as long as you understand that the AF is not as good. the IQ in my opinion is better on the Fuji. i think that the OM-D is the better all around do it all camera but if you can live with not as fast AF and not as many lenses, the Fuji is a great choice as well.
Certainly... but I also consider DSLRs from Canon and Nikon (and the like) also viable alternatives. It all depends on your expectations and needs/wants.
Separate names with a comma.