Howdy, I do realize that my question might stir up feelings and passions but what's better than putting the cat among the pigeons... OK, let's make it simple. Firstly, E-X1 is worse than OM-D AF-wise, isn't it? I don't take sports-related or any in-motion pictures anyway. Secondly, Fuji (so far) can offer a poor selection of lenses, can't they? Yet, the 18-55 f/2.8-4.0 OIS produces really impressive shots and I have no money to buy anything else at this point... Here's my current set: Olly E-PL1 with Zuiko 14-45mk2, Lumix 45-200 (yeah... you'll curse me for this one, won't you?) and Zuiko 45mm love My initial idea was to get an OM-D... but the more I read about Fuji X-E1, the more I feel like cheating on Olympus... Is it true that Fuji will produce significantly better shallow-depth-of-field pics? What faults can we find about X-E1? It does seem to be gorgeous... It's hard not to drool over it... PS. Please don't say that I have already answered my dilemma myself by saying what I said in the first part of the post. PS2. I do not possess a vast knowledge in the field.