1. Welcome to Mu-43.com—a friendly Micro 4/3 camera & photography discussion forum!

    If you are thinking of buying a camera or need help with your photos, you will find our forum members full of advice! Click here to join for free!

Epm1 shooter looking for some advice

Discussion in 'Olympus Cameras' started by greysonj, Nov 19, 2012.

  1. greysonj

    greysonj Mu-43 Rookie

    13
    Nov 12, 2012
    I've got an epm1 and have been shooting solely with manual lenses. Mostly the 50mm super tak. I love the character from this lens, but a friend asked me to shoot her son's fifth birthday party and out of 80 photos only 40 up to standard. So I am in the market for an autofocus lens. I've seen plenty of photos from epm1s with the pl25 and the oly45 but I haven't seen any with the 75mm. I am quite interested in the lens, but the high price tag makes me weary. I know what it is capable of, but would it be worth having it on my camera?
     
  2. capodave

    capodave Mu-43 Top Veteran

    514
    Jul 4, 2010
    Southern Cal
    Dave
    It's a great lens.
    After trying one I decided the fov was too long for most of what I would be taking.
    I have a 45 and that is also a great lens, but for most pictures I take I use the panny 20 for it's fov, low light capabilities and small form factor.
     
  3. mr_botak

    mr_botak Mu-43 Veteran

    222
    Dec 4, 2011
    Reading, UK
    David
    The 20 is good, the 12 is also extremely nice. Perhaps a shorter adapted lens would help? The OM 24 is very very good.
     
  4. greysonj

    greysonj Mu-43 Rookie

    13
    Nov 12, 2012
    Thanks for the replies. I actually prefer the longer focal lengths so, while I will eventually pick up a pl25 for indoors my first inclination is to get a longer lens because I will use it more. I guess my real question is this: will the epm1 keep up with the quality of the lens?
     
  5. mr_botak

    mr_botak Mu-43 Veteran

    222
    Dec 4, 2011
    Reading, UK
    David
    Yes - no problem keeping up - the e-pm1 I have has produced some spectacular images with a variety of lenses.
     
  6. greysonj

    greysonj Mu-43 Rookie

    13
    Nov 12, 2012
    What I needed to hear! And also a relief to my wife because I've been trying to convince her to let me grab an omd
     
  7. Jonathan F/2

    Jonathan F/2 Mu-43 Hall of Famer

    Aug 10, 2011
    Los Angeles, USA
    I'd get a 12-35 for event style shooting. The ability to go wide-and-long while maintaining a constant aperture is the forte for that type of lens.
     
  8. elavon

    elavon Mu-43 All-Pro

    Sep 1, 2012
    Tel Aviv Israel
    Ehud
  9. Ned

    Ned Mu-43 Legend

    Jul 18, 2010
    Alberta, Canada
    If you like your Super-Tak not too badly, then maybe the 75mm would be a better compliment. The only issue you may find with it is that it'll be too long for some purposes, but if that happens you still have your Super-Tak to fall back on. Although, if you do continue using the super-tak, I would suggest you get the VF-2 if you don't already have it. Yes, you will love that lens on the E-PM1 and you don't need an OM-D to get the best out of it.
     
  10. Mellow

    Mellow Mu-43 All-Pro

    Aug 27, 2010
    Florida or Idaho
    Tom
    Do you have any zoom lenses? If I were to keep one m43 lens it would be the Panasonic 14-45mm, which can be had for about $250. It's OIS is also very effective (more effective than the E-PM1's IBIS).
     
  11. greysonj

    greysonj Mu-43 Rookie

    13
    Nov 12, 2012
    I love my super tak which is why I am not in a hurry to buy the 45mm. I bought the vf-2 about a week after I started shooting with manual lenses. The only reason I would need to get a shorter lens is to take pictures around a table for family dinners. Most of the stuff I do is outside and the times I am inside my 50mm is good enough. That sounds like a pretty good combo to me.

    this is why I will keep my super tak

    <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/greysonjohnston/8201015498/" title="P1013352 by greyson.johnston, on Flickr"> 8201015498_a752a74ae0_z. "640" height="483" alt="P1013352"></a>

    <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/greysonjohnston/8199920503/" title="P1013356 - Version 2 by greyson.johnston, on Flickr"> 8199920503_8cf7986117_z. "640" height="483" alt="P1013356 - Version 2"></a>


    I'm not a huge fan of zooms, although I still have the kit zoom that came on my epm1. I figure I wouldn't be able to get a whole lot for it and my wife isn't very adept with focusing manually. It does alright for what it does.
     
  12. stonetape72

    stonetape72 Mu-43 Regular

    94
    Jul 24, 2012
    The 75mm is an astonishingly good lens - can't recommend it highly enough. That said, the 45mm isn't far behind and it's a better focal length for everyday use. You'll end up with both at some point, I bet :) 
     
  13. greysonj

    greysonj Mu-43 Rookie

    13
    Nov 12, 2012
    Well, sorry to resurrect the thread, but I really appreciate the advice. I couldn't convince my wife to let me buy it, but I did rent it for a shoot on Saturday (of which I have mixed feelings: it's awesome to get paid, but having only the epm1 I feel like people look at it like a point and shoot... I need the omd haha) and holy crap is it beautiful! I love my super tak and it has tons of character, but it's obvious this is in a league above. AF was a little slow and at times inaccurate, but that could have been me because, admittedly, it was strange to use AF over MF. Overall, I loved this lens and will buy it eventually. Until then I will just be renting it for shoots.
     

    Attached Files:

    • Like Like x 1
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.