Hi all, Recently updated from a P&S to the EPM1. So far the EPM1 + kit lens has been an obvious step up in IQ from my previous P&S in good light, however in lowlight indoor enivronments, it's still average at best. I understand from reading previous threads, to improve lowlight shots, it's best to invest in a fast lens such as the panny 20mm, pl 25mm or olympus 45mm. But once you factor in the cost of these additional lenses, the overall costs would exceed many budget dslr with kit lens such as canon 550D, nikon D3200 or sony a37. Having not used a dslr before, my question is, ignoring the obviously size difference, would a budget dslr + kit lens like the ones listed above give me better overall image quality, especially in lowlight compared to an EPM1 + p20, pl25, O45. Just don't want to be spending all this money on expensive lenses when if it makes more sense to just buy a budget dslr, if obtaining the best IQ is my #1 priority. Cheers all for your input!