This review is split into three posts, due to the limit on the number of images that can be included per post Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available) The up front and honest bit : First of all, just so we are completely transparent, I'm an Elinchrom Ambassador. Secondly, I happen to be an Ambassador because I use Elinchrom, not the other way around. Obviously, there are some perks to this, such as having the opportunity to use and test the latest equipment before its public release. As I use four ELB400 units for my location work, the new ELB500 announced earlier this year is of particular interest to me. My four ELB400s are used most days, with a variety of subject matter, and in varied conditions. And whilst I was quite confident I'd have no issues using the ELB500 in place of an ELB400, I wondered how much real difference this new unit would make. After all, I'd been perfectly happy with my current setup for over two years. No issues, no dramas and certainly no disappointments. And considering my investment in those four units, how much advantage would the ELB500 bring, and would it put my ELB400 relationship at risk? Manufacturer Specs 500 Ws IGBT Full Asymmetry 7 F-stops Adjustment TTL HSS 16.3 x 9.0 x 18.1 cm (LxWxH) 2.48 kg (unit + battery) 1.74 kg (without battery) Flash Duration - Action: 1/20000s Flash Duration - Normal: 1/3400s Recycling Times - 0.05 - 2 seconds OLED control display First Impressions When I get any new kit, whether for use or review, the first job is to familiarise myself with its controls and menu system. For a review, that's kinda obvious anyway. But for use on a job, it becomes a little more critical. Besides not wanting to look like a complete spoon in front of a client, time spent fiddling erodes confidence. Not to mention it can stop you getting the best out of the kit. The ELB500 was subjected to the usual exploration, although it all seemed very familiar. Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available) The display is much bigger than the ELB400, and similar to the one I encountered on the ELB1200 [ Review - Elinchrom ELB1200 Review ]. And like the ELB1200, you have to select the head once they are attached. This is an improvement over the ELB400, where the head cable sockets are “live” if the unit is turned on, and attaching a head in a live state can cause issues if you aren't paying attention. Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available) Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available) Talking of heads, the new ELB500 head is different to its predecessors. It has a less angular look and feel to its edges, and it also has a light textured finished. Now it may not seem much, but this is a welcome feature to someone who often shoots in wet conditions. On a couple of occasions, I've been seen to juggle an ELB400 head that has shot out of my hand as I've tried to maintain a tight grip on it. The new heads also feature a fixed cable, as opposed to the separate cable on the ELB400. It's supplied with one of those rather nice, Elinchrom branded cable tidies. One less connection to make when setting up, which is okay by me. This also means if you have two heads connected, you can turn a head on or off, and not have to physically unplug it, as you did with the ELB400. The modelling light has been improved over the earlier heads. It's much brighter and also dimmable. Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available) And the head options for the ELB500? Just one. Whereas the ELB400 had three head options; Action, Pro and HS. The one ELB500 head covers all requirements. To match the ELB400 Action head, the ELB500 offers an action mode, selected from the unit's menu. The ELB400 Action head offered a shortest light duration of 1/5,700th sec via port B. The ELB500 offers 1/20,000th sec through either, or both heads at minimum output. When comparing the ELB400 HS heads, the ELB500 uses HSS for shutter speeds beyond the xsynch speed. This bit intrigued me, as I have frequently used the ELB400 with HS heads for a number of jobs, and loved the available power when doing so. Mid afternoon in Texas was a piece of cake! Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available) The HSS v HS intrigued me, and I wondered how they would compare. This would be the first test I would want to carry out as soon as I'd done my initial inspection. Incidentally, anyone thinking about interchanging heads with the older ELB400 or Quadra heads, don't! The ELB500 will display an error if you connect any of the older heads, and won't fire. The ELB400 will fire with the ELB500 head, but results aren't predictable, and Elinchrom state it shouldn't be done. Your warranty won't cover any damage if something silly happens. The voltage of the packs and heads are different. The head port covers on the unit are an improvement over the ELB400. They are now a larger rubber cover, which simply pops back on a hinge, allowing the heads to be connected. Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available) Once a head has been activated by selecting the appropriate button, the display changes, and includes the flash duration for the selected power output. Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available) Selecting a second head causes the display to split, showing the information for each head. With the ELB400, the power was changed in 1/10th increments, by a press of a button. On the ELB500, the buttons now increase or decrease the power by a full stop, and 1/10th adjustments can be made by a twist of the dial. This method of adjustment was first seen on the ELB1200, and I found it a real improvement, making it much quicker and more accurate. I'm really pleased it's been incorporated into the ELB500. The menu system has been tinkered with too. The navigation is now done with the dial. Spinning to navigate the menu items, and a push of the dial to select the item. Very quick in operation. Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available) Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available) Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available) Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available) ELB500 vs. ELB400 So what are the differences? Well, you can't fail to spot the headline news regarding TTL. A first for Elinchrom, along with IGBT technology, bringing a swathe of advantages. Shorter flash durations, quicker recycling, better power management etc. The ELB500 has a single head, which will do all that is required, whereas the ELB400 had three optional heads. Besides having to pack more gear, there was the cost implication too. The new head is attached to the power cord, which makes it quicker to deploy, but possibly bulkier to pack, depending on how you packed your ELB400 heads. The modelling light is much brighter, and now a proportional setting is also available. The ELB500 pack itself, is almost 2.5Kg with the battery, which is heavier than the ELB400s weight of about 2Kg. On the plus side, the new battery charges much quicker, and now has “active” charging, meaning the pack can be used and charged at the same time. Talking of charging, the new charger for the ELB500 is much smaller too. A boon if you travel a lot, as it will occupy about half the space of the ELB400 charger. The ELB400 has lugs to cater for a strap, allowing you to carry it with ease, or your assistant to do so. The ELB500 doesn't have lugs, but does come with a “Snappy”, which is basically a tailored padded carry rig, allowing the attachment of a (much improved) strap. My ELB400 units were never carried, and the original straps are still in their plastic bags. So my first thought was to take the ELB500 out of the snappy, but I found it didn't really interfere with the use of the ELB500. It also has a transparent panel that passes over the top of the unit, providing some protection from the elements if you're out in the wet stuff. The snappy case also has a flap on the side, which reveals the socket for the charger. The ELB400 is Asymmetrical in power output between the two ports. When used together, port A had 66% of the available power, and the B port had 33%. On their own, B port gave you 0.1 through to 4.4 output, Whilst the A port gave you 1.7 through to 6.0. I found this to be generally fine, except on the occasions where you may have been shooting with high power on a single head, such as an automotive shoot, and then shooting the car interior, where you possibly needed a much lower output, and had to faff switching ports. To be honest, you tend to do it without really thinking, until you use the ELB500, where the power output for either port is the full range, 0.1 right through to 6.3. The real boon is the full asymmetry of the two ports on the ELB500. Complete freedom of power allocation between them both. Again, you have no idea just how convenient it is, until you use it. The ELB500 is rated at 400 full power pops, whereas the ELB400 is rated at 350. However, that's only half the story, as the ELB500 manages the power far better, and the available number of flashes goes up, as you turn the power down. Up to an incredible 28,000 at minimum power. Testing The first thing to do was to check the output. The lightmeter was placed at a distance of 1m from the the head, firing through the standard 18cm reflector, and with the lightmeter set to an ISO of 200. Power | ELB500 & 18cm Reflector 6.3 | 64-7 6 | 64-4 5 | 45-5 4 | 32-4 3 | 22-5 2 | 16-6 1 | 11-5 0.1 | 8.0-6 And how about the colour temperature? A Minolta colour meter was placed 2m from the head. The head was attached to a 21cm reflector via the Q mount to EL adaptor. Both the standard and action modes were tested. Power | Standard | Action Mode 6.3 | 5610 | 5600 3.3 | 5750 | 5820 1.3 | 5660 | 5882 0.1 | 5560 | 5970 The action mode shows the expected drift towards a cooler temp as the power is turned down, although actually less than I expected. Next, I wanted to try the TTL and HSS. The new Skyport Pro trigger, which incorporates the TTL functionality, was only available in Nikon, Canon and Sony flavours at the time of testing. My weapon of choice is Olympus, which kinda left me hanging. So, to get the TTL tested, I borrowed a D4 and had a play. Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available) This was shot with the trigger set to TTL and using HSS at 1/8000th sec ISO200 and f8 Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available) The trigger allows you to switch from TTL to manual, which was done for this shot. Unlike some systems where the transition from TTL to manual is calculated, there's nothing to calculate with the ELB500. Whilst the trigger is in TTL mode, the actual power output is displayed on the unit, so you can see exactly what is being selected and used by the TTL trigger. Switching to manual does nothing more then change the transmitter mode, leaving the power exactly where it was last used. I found this method of displaying the actual power output during TTL to be very reassuring, as I always felt as if I was cut out of the equation when using speedlights in TTL mode. In fact any of the TTL capable location lights left me guessing as to how much power output was actually in use, as their displays just indicated TTL, and whether or not you have dialled in any exposure compensation. The above image is after dropping from TTL to manual, but making no adjustments. Same camera settings. Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available) Now, this is the interesting bit. This image uses the same camera settings of 1/8000th sec ISO200 and f8, and an ELB400 with HS head at full whack. And that got me thinking. I'd spoken to The Flash Centre about the ELB500 and HSS, and asked about HS. The answer was a straight no. The ELB500 was designed to get the most out of HSS, and wouldn't manage effective HS. Which is obvious if you think about it. HSS utilises IGBT, and physically cuts the flash output, whereas HS makes use of voltage controlled adjustment, which extends the light curve as you turn it down. Well, I couldn't just leave it at that, and swapped to the Olympus E-M1 mkII and had a bit of a play. Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available) ELB400 with HS head at full whack – 1/8000th sec ISO400 f11 Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available) ELB500 standard mode and full power - 1/8000th sec ISO400 f11 And it looks about half a stop brighter to me. Now, there's a couple of things to bear in mind here. First, the mirrorless cameras tend to wring that little bit more out of HS than full frame cameras, as there isn't the slight delay for the mirror to swing out of the way. This means it makes a little more use of the main body of the flash curve. After all, we are talking tail hacking here, although the Skyport HS system is more complex, providing adjustment to get the very most out of the available light curve using ODS with their HS heads. Secondly, the ELB500 can only be used in this manner when firing at full power (hence the hack reference), otherwise the tail of the light curve is cut by the IGBT, and your shutter basically misses the light output. Whereas the ELB400 allows complete power adjustment when using HS, and is therefore more flexible than the ELB500 in this tail hack technique; The ELB500 is seamless when using HSS, as there's no head change. For me, this means I can make use of the ELB500 in a rudimentary HS manner, until I can make use of HSS when the Olympus Skyport Pro is available. For you folks with Nikon, Canon and Sony, you aren't remotely worried about HS, as you have HSS to play with. Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available) The setup for the HSS/HS test Continued in the next post, due to image limit per post.