Hi. I am on my first week of ownership of a brand new E-PL2 with kit lense and up to date firmware. Very nice little camera. Bought it for an up and coming 1 year long bicycle trip in South America. I wanted a small but able camera. 1- Unless doing snapshot, i can’t shoot very long without a view finder. I would have to buy a VF2 or VF3. I may need a longer reach lense too. 2- I have not get the hang of overiding AF when using S-AF-M. 3- I am used to my old D40 colors and find the E-PL2 pretty dull. I have found a working setupfor me in Rawtherapee to get colors i like tought. 4- The biggest one and i will have to take a closer look to it but yesterday i made side by side landscape picture with the E-PL2 and my old Nikon D40 (APS-C sensor from 2006 and kit lense). In Rawtherapee, the D40 is better. The E-PL2 one seem soft. I was In aperture priority at 1/320s on each camera. F11 for the E-PL2, F13 for the D40, handheld (D40 is steadier against my forehead). Maybe the D40 profile in Rawtherapee sharpen and not the one for the E-PL2? Maybe comparing JPG would be another way of testing? What could i do to test it? I was told the E-PL2 would be better than the D40 even if its sensor is smaller (several years younger). Lenses were supposed to be equal. The E-PL2 is an easier camera to travel with for sure but since i do mainly landscape, i’d like to get as nice picture as possible so i could go back to the D40 at worst. What do you think?