/ Register


  1. Welcome to Mu-43.com—a friendly Micro 4/3 camera & photography discussion forum!

    If you are thinking of buying a camera or need help with your photos, you will find our forum members full of advice! Click here to join for free!

E-PL1 + Tamron 90mm/f2.8 = Happy Camper

Discussion in 'Adapted Lenses' started by naturecloseups, Jul 12, 2010.

Top Rated
  1. naturecloseups

    naturecloseups Mu-43 Regular

    93
    Jun 10, 2010
    Ok, my first adapted lens to be taken outdoors is the Tamron 90mm/f2.8 AF Macro.

    For the last 12 years it has served me very well on slide film and on DSLRs. Now gracing my E-PL1, and still doing a good job!

    Both are uncropped, "full-frame"

    Hoverfly at rest

    4786371199_e353662e77_b.jpg
    Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


    Jewel Shield Bug

    4786370913_7f67c13f29_b.jpg
    Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)



    And 100% crops attached, have fun locating the body parts in full-frame shots :) 
     

    Attached Files:

    naturecloseups, Jul 12, 2010
    #1
    • Like Like x 6
  2. et100

    et100 Mu-43 Regular

    80
    Feb 15, 2010
    Chicago area - USA
    great captures, are they taken at 1:1 magnification?
     
    et100, Jul 12, 2010
    #2
  3. BartonFlyer

    BartonFlyer Mu-43 Regular

    105
    Jan 21, 2010
    Bolton, UK
    Fabulous - I used to have one with my Sony DSLR kit, it got damaged when I got knocked of my motorbike and I sold it on eBay - but I was always delighted with the quality it delivered - looks like you are too - excellent pictures :) 
     
    BartonFlyer, Jul 12, 2010
    #3
    • Like Like x 1
  4. naturecloseups

    naturecloseups Mu-43 Regular

    93
    Jun 10, 2010
    et100, thanks. Both are slightly less than 1:1. I would guess perhaps about .8x. Since I was not carrying a focusing rail, staying at 1:1 was bit of a challenge since a tripod alone does not allow for fine-tuning subject distance as well as a rail does.
     
    naturecloseups, Jul 12, 2010
    #4
    • Like Like x 1
  5. naturecloseups

    naturecloseups Mu-43 Regular

    93
    Jun 10, 2010
    Couple more using the Tamron 90 macro

    4825426687_7595e1eb7f_b.jpg
    Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


    Yet to id, but looks like a species of Lanternfly

    4825427133_9882e950b2_b.jpg
    Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)
     
    naturecloseups, Jul 25, 2010
    #5
    • Like Like x 1
  6. sam_m

    sam_m Mu-43 Regular

    182
    Jul 26, 2010
    wow great shots, tack sharp too, well done
     
    sam_m, Aug 9, 2010
    #6
    • Like Like x 1
  7. blue

    blue Mu-43 Veteran

    281
    Jun 1, 2010
    UK
    They're great - the closeup detail in the eye, you can see the individual cells !
     
    blue, Aug 10, 2010
    #7
  8. Iconindustries

    Iconindustries Mu-43 Hall of Famer

    2,196
    Jan 31, 2010
    Cecil Plains, Queensland, Australia
    Hey mate thanks for showing us these bugs. You have a real knack for getting these shots and I'd havta say also alot of patience.
     
    Iconindustries, Aug 10, 2010
    #8
  9. hmpws

    hmpws Mu-43 Regular

    177
    Apr 24, 2010
    Auckland, New Zealand
    If I get anything similar to those photos, I would be happy too!
     
    hmpws, Aug 10, 2010
    #9
  10. Janis

    Janis Mu-43 Regular

    31
    Jul 13, 2010
    Central Texas
    Excellent detail and color! How much did you stop down the lens?
     
    Janis, Aug 10, 2010
    #10
  11. naturecloseups

    naturecloseups Mu-43 Regular

    93
    Jun 10, 2010
    Hi Janis -- the first, second and fourth photos were f11, the third one was f8.

     
    naturecloseups, Aug 11, 2010
    #11
  12. Mojeska

    Mojeska New to Mu-43

    6
    Jun 8, 2010
    So what adapter did you use for this lens?
     
    Mojeska, Aug 11, 2010
    #12
  13. naturecloseups

    naturecloseups Mu-43 Regular

    93
    Jun 10, 2010
    These days I use the Voigtlander N/F->m4/3 adapter. A friend is bringing the Novoflex FD->m4/3 adapter from the US.

    On a related note, both my Nikon and Canon FD adapters from Rainbow Imaging (aka jinfinance?) turned out to be misadventures. The Nikon one was plagued by a light leak and the FD one has a slight play at the m4/3 mount end when mounted that causes the E-PL1 live view to black out when rotated (using the "play") to the right. Rather unfortunate, since I paid about $100 for them combined -- which included customs duty and international shipping.

    However -- I am very pleased with my Voigtlander adapter. Solidly made yet nicely tactile -- feels and works like a quality product.

     
    naturecloseups, Aug 11, 2010
    #13
  14. G1 User

    G1 User Mu-43 Veteran

    411
    Jul 20, 2010
    Really nice, close, plenty of detail.

    I was thinking of getting an adapter for my PK/AF mount Sigma EX 105mm f/2.8 Macro. This may have convinced me to get it... I do have a 3 tube extension set in native m/43. And I used it today with my Zeiss ZM 50mm, It was fun and I found out, it was easier to use the LCD for focusing by moving the camera back and forth. It works OK, just really close to the subject.
     
    G1 User, Aug 11, 2010
    #14
  15. JoepLX3

    JoepLX3 Mu-43 Top Veteran

    509
    Jun 13, 2010
    Japan
    I know about really close too, my LX3 lens got wet because the insects were playing with their legs/wings...

    I am curious what the IQ difference is between (e.g.):
    - Crop of 50 mm F1.8
    - 100 mm F2.8
    - 2x extension tube on 50 mm F1.8

    These picture above look great!!!
     
    JoepLX3, Aug 11, 2010
    #15
  16. Yotsuba

    Yotsuba Mu-43 Regular

    144
    Feb 28, 2010
    Singapore
    Hi Naturecloseups

    You didnt use flash, right?

    Regards
    Chris
     
    Yotsuba, Aug 12, 2010
    #16
  17. naturecloseups

    naturecloseups Mu-43 Regular

    93
    Jun 10, 2010
    Hi Yotsuba -- no I did not use flash for any of these. The lighting was bright yet overcast on both days that looked fine by itself.

     
    naturecloseups, Aug 12, 2010
    #17
  18. julienrl

    julienrl Mu-43 Regular

    100
    Jul 28, 2010
    Ottawa, Ontario
    how close did you have to get?
     
    julienrl, Aug 12, 2010
    #18
  19. naturecloseups

    naturecloseups Mu-43 Regular

    93
    Jun 10, 2010
    Julien -- for the Lanternfly shot (the one with orange lipstick :wink:) I was almost at closest focus which is about 10cm (4 inches). The others were about 7-10 inches away.

     
    naturecloseups, Aug 13, 2010
    #19
    • Like Like x 1
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Accept Learn More...