E-p3/17mm 2.8 or E-pm2/E-pl5?

Halaking

Mu-43 Top Veteran
Joined
Dec 17, 2012
Messages
673
Location
Los Angeles
Real Name
Morris
I'm looking 2nd body pair with omd, the recent price drop on new E-p3 with 17mm 2.8 prime is only $450, I was thinking about the E-pm2 or the E-pl5 for the new sensor, but the E-p3's larger body and more controls is much easier to hold and play with, I think even sigma 19mm is little too big for the E-pm2, that make it looks and feel like NEX (small body/large lens), what do you think? Thanks!!
 

mattia

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
2,391
Location
The Netherlands
Are you going to be satisfied with worse sensor performance compared with the E-M5? That's the key question.
 

Streetshooter

Administrator Emeritus
Joined
Dec 15, 2009
Messages
5,138
Location
Phila, Pa USA
I'm looking 2nd body pair with omd, the recent price drop on new E-p3 with 17mm 2.8 prime is only $450, I was thinking about the E-pm2 or the E-pl5 for the new sensor, but the E-p3's larger body and more controls is much easier to hold and play with, I think even sigma 19mm is little too big for the E-pm2, that make it looks and feel like NEX (small body/large lens), what do you think? Thanks!!
I use 2 E-P3's and have no issues selling my work to any client including Museums, collectors or PR Firms. The camera has a great UI and is a pleasure to use.
BTW....I just got one from Unique in Black with the 17 2.8 for $419.00 delivered....

don
 

sgt08

Mu-43 All-Pro
Joined
Mar 12, 2011
Messages
1,214
Location
Hong Kong
Real Name
Scott
For me the key difference between the E-Px and the lower-tier models is the extra controls. If those aren't as important to you, go with one of the newer sensor bodies.
 

mh2000

Mu-43 Veteran
Joined
Jul 3, 2010
Messages
254
Wow! That's a great deal!!! FWIW, I'm still shooting my E-P1 (same sensor) and am still very happy with the results I'm getting. If I wasn't, I'd already have the OM-D.

IMO, the 17 looks really nice in black... maybe you are getting black E-P3 and 17? That would be sweet!

:)
 

gugarci

Mu-43 Veteran
Joined
Jul 8, 2012
Messages
304
Location
Lyndhurst, NJ
Real Name
Bill
Are you going to be satisfied with worse sensor performance compared with the E-M5? That's the key question.
The difference in IQ between the 2 sensors is in the DR and high ISO performance. If you expose correctly DR is not a big issue. If you use LR and use the local adjustment tools DR becomes and even smaller issue when you expose incorrectly. Also I don't have any DR issues with my LX3 either.

Also noise does not worry me because I always keep my ISO low, even when using my Nikon. And if noise becomes an issue Neat Image free works very well and so does LR's built in noise removal tool and Topaz DeNoise is even slightly better.

The glass is more important than the body.
 

Halaking

Mu-43 Top Veteran
Joined
Dec 17, 2012
Messages
673
Location
Los Angeles
Real Name
Morris
Thank you for all the replies!!

I do think the IQ from the new sensor is great, just like the omd, but larger body with more buttoms/wheels is very welcome for day to day use, for the price, I guess just can't have it all. :horse:

Maybe just wait for the E-p5? but looks like no VF and MSRP @ less 1k. :frown:
 

Ned

Mu-43 Legend
Joined
Jul 18, 2010
Messages
5,538
Location
Alberta, Canada
The viewfinder is an important accessory, I agree. For me, I would rather pick up the E-PM2 or E-PL5 and add the cost of the VF-2 or VF-3 for the same price or less as the upcoming E-P5 (and will have it a lot sooner, too!).
 

Latest posts

Links on this page may be to our affiliates. Sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
Mu-43 is a fan site and not associated with Olympus, Panasonic, or other manufacturers mentioned on this site.
Forum post reactions by Twemoji: https://github.com/twitter/twemoji
Copyright © 2009-2019 Amin Forums, LLC
Top Bottom