I did do a search but came up with nowt....sorry if this has been asked before. Taking delivery of a E-P1 and Panasonic 14-45mm lens soon both of which have IS so should i turn the IS off on the lens or is it better to either use just the lens IS or both?
I seem to remember an owner of both on here before saying he reckoned the Pana OIS worked better. No idea if you can use both.
From what I read (don't remember where) ot os recommended to switch one off - on camera or lens is your choice.
Discussed in FAR more detail than you'll probably ever want to read. Overall conclusion is that the OIS is a bit better than IBIS generally, but don't use either when using a tripod and there appears to be no downside to using both. I personally find an upside to using both with the 45-200, but I don' know if its real or imagined. Certainly doesn't hurt though. https://www.mu-43.com/f42/image-stabilization-ep-1-panasonic-45-200-lens-1674/ -Ray
I have the 45-200 Panny for my E-P1 and there isn't any significant difference in stabilisation quality with that lens using the 2 methods. You do get a slightly more stable image with the lens IS but it is really only noticable at the longer end of the zoom range of the 45-200 so I wouldn't expect much benefit (if any) on the shorter zoom. I leave the in-camera IS on as I swap between Olympus lenses and the 20mm Panny which doesn't have lens-based IS. Try it out for yourself and choose whatever you prefer. That's part of the fun. Cheers PeterB666
I found the IBIS better on the 14-45. But, the lens IS is real good on the long end. I keep IBIS on all the time and with longer lenses, I use Both systems. On the shorter end just the IBIS
ibis is great but the lens ois is somewhat better imho , not certain about this , anyway when ibis is switched off and ois is switched on you can see it working to combat shake in real time , esp in mag mode , looks like canon IS binocs .... everything is smoothed
