I'm about to switch from my Canon 40d DSLR to a more smaller and lightweight mirrorless. The M10 is now the top of my list.
I'm only hesitating if I should start with the 14-42 EZ pancake kit lens, or go for the 12-50?
I want to buy additional faster primes later on, if I'm happy with the M43 (which I probably will :smile
.
The 14-42 pancake looks great on the M10, nice and small (one of my biggest reasons to ditch the DSLR). However, the 12-50 would give me more range (although I know the optics are not the best) and does have a macro function. On the other hand, it's quit big compared to 14-42 (maybe too big for the M10?). Weather sealing is a minor issue, since the M10 isn't sealed either.
Are the optics of the 12-50 better in the 14-42 range than the 14-42 EZ, and does this overcome the bigger size?
Any ideas?
I know there is also a great 12-40 2.8, but is too expensive for me right now without prior experience in the M43.
Thanks advance,
Arjen
I'm only hesitating if I should start with the 14-42 EZ pancake kit lens, or go for the 12-50?
I want to buy additional faster primes later on, if I'm happy with the M43 (which I probably will :smile
The 14-42 pancake looks great on the M10, nice and small (one of my biggest reasons to ditch the DSLR). However, the 12-50 would give me more range (although I know the optics are not the best) and does have a macro function. On the other hand, it's quit big compared to 14-42 (maybe too big for the M10?). Weather sealing is a minor issue, since the M10 isn't sealed either.
Are the optics of the 12-50 better in the 14-42 range than the 14-42 EZ, and does this overcome the bigger size?
Any ideas?
I know there is also a great 12-40 2.8, but is too expensive for me right now without prior experience in the M43.
Thanks advance,
Arjen