So was quite surprised to watch this review, where the E-M10 was criticised for bad AF performance in low light and moving objects. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rK1K32K-9nA While I haven't tried the E-M10, I do think OMD + 45mm is a reasonable performer. Maybe two things have happened here: This reviewer seems to be just coming from DSLR land, and has expectations to match. It's a long time since the X-E1 days, where Fuji had the slow AF crown. These days Fuji is pumping, and the E-M1 (with it's quarter size sensor) is left to hold up the OMD range at the expensive price point. As far as continuous/moving AF is concerened, anyway. Was going to blindly order an E-M10 soon, after holding one for a few minutes today. Think I may wait a little longer now and see. Would be good to hold and X-T1 too, even though they are completely different beasts.... more for value comparison, atleast. Thoughts?