I suspect things should go well, but I am now fighting against time for the rest of the week. I am glad to hear that the AF was improved, as I never found the C-AF on the MK I to work for me. I have higher hopes for the Mk II, and it sounds like I may be happy with the results.All good Ken and by the sound of it you likely would have zero issues anyway, but it's your personal call.
It still seems that most are being overly cautious and even you are basing expectation on experiences with other systems.
I'm going to put this in reverse context after using the EM1X and EM1mk2 FW31 since they both became available and i would not hesitate to pick up my old EM1mk1 that my son has on loan and use it with only the following concern...... there is no way i would use/trust the AFC to be up to par with the newer bodies, the rest would just perform in line with technical limits between the systems ... no zagging when it should zig etc.
The only reason i didn't use it as a third body for his wedding shoot was he forgot to charge the batteries!!!!
the AF/CAF is so far improved on the Mk2fw3x that even if it did zag i'm personally convinced you would still end up with more keepers
didn't 3.1 resolved 99% of the 3.0 issues covered in that particular thread anyway...?