My reaction is "unexciting". I'd be hard-pressed to justify the E-PL2 over the 1 given the cost difference at the moment. I was really hoping for something that raised the game a bit more. I like the control wheel and high res LCD, and the 2 surely looks better, but that is just not enough for me.
That's what I noticed, too. How is it that the NEX is better than the EPL1 or EPL2?I am a litle confused by the high ISO tests..
They say the APS-C cameras like the NEX is clearly better, but at higher ISO (when you look at RAW) there is clearly more detail in the EPL-2 shots than the NEX shots.. So is Sony using noise reduction in RAW, are their lenses just crappy or is there something wrong with the test procedures???? (or am I just blind?)
Also as you move from ISO 200 -> 400 -> 800 the detail in the RAW image for the Olympus EPL2 clearly gets better and better.. That makes little sense to me, it is more than just the grain adding an impression as detail, compare the 200 -> 400 to prove that...
P.S. This is based on page 7