Do you think there will be more wide angle options?

plantain

Mu-43 Regular
Joined
Mar 18, 2014
Messages
157
Location
Halifax, NS Canada
Real Name
Jim
Do you think there will be more wide angle options besides the Olympus 9-18mm and the upcoming 7-14mm 2.8 Pro?
I know Panasonic has their 7-14mm f4 but I will probably wait for the 17-14 2.8 Pro as it is will be weather-sealed where the Panasonic is not.

I'm just curious because Canon introduced their 10-18mm f4.5-5.6 IS STM lens for $299.00. It is specifically designed for the APS-C sensor.
The other wide angle for the APS-C was the 10-22mm which was a really nice lens but more expensive. It gives Canon users a inexpensive wide angle alternative.

It would be nice to have an inexpensive wide option for m43.

I guess I just miss my wide angle!
 

hookgrip

Mu-43 Regular
Joined
May 21, 2013
Messages
150
The 10-18mm Canon is really interesting. At least based on MTF charts, it is better than the Canon 10-22 EF-S, which was one of the best ultrawides on APS-C. The fact that the 10-18 is $299 is even more amazing.

I'm hoping Olympus or Panasonic can do a reasonably priced 8-16mm. The 9-18mm is decent, but overpriced for its performance, and 18mm equivalent really isn't very wide once you've used a 14mm lens on full-frame ;)
 

barry13

Mu-43.com Editor
Joined
Mar 7, 2014
Messages
9,107
Location
Southern California
Real Name
Barry
Kowa has an 8.5mm lens announced which I believe is rectilinear (non-fisheye), however it will probably not be cheap.

I need 8mm or less for occasional real estate photos though, so I'm waiting to see how the Oly 7-14mm will be before deciding.

Barry
 

letsgofishing

Mu-43 Veteran
Joined
Nov 21, 2012
Messages
352
Location
South Africa
Real Name
Mike Kaplan
I posted the same comment elsewhere - I know it's only f4.5-5.6, but a stabilised lens this size for $299?? - unbelievable!
Similar size to the Panny 7-14 but 60g lighter - AND IT TAKES FILTERS!
 

Growltiger

Mu-43 All-Pro
Joined
Mar 26, 2014
Messages
1,867
Location
UK
But 10-18 is barely into ultrawide if it was M43. One really needs 8 or better 7.
 

Qiou87

Mu-43 Regular
Joined
Jul 15, 2013
Messages
150
Location
Paris, France
That's equivalent to 15-24.....
Actually that's 16-29mm equivalent, seeing as Canon has 1.6x crop factor (I know, weird). In any case this new Canon lens just highlights the lack of any affordable quality UWA in the m4/3 system. What I also do not get is why Rokinon/Samyang doesn't do a 7 or 8mm rectilinear prime. Seeing as lots of people bought their 7,5mm fisheye, I'm sure they could have a sufficient market. I miss my Samyang 16mm f/2.8 (on FF)...
 

mistermark

Mu-43 Regular
Joined
Oct 16, 2012
Messages
118
Given that there are already 7-14 and 9-18 zooms and soon a second 7-14, but the widest AF reticlinear prime is 12mm, I think we're overdue to get a prime non-fisheye lens wider than 12mm. Ideally, I'd like to see a Zuiko somewhere between 8 and 10mm, 46mm filter thread, available in black, ideally weather-sealed, same pull-back focus ring as the 12 and 25, ideally maximum aperture 2.0 but would accept 2.8 if performance wide open is strong and the filter thread can be kept to 46mm.
 
Links on this page may be to our affiliates. Sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
Mu-43 is a fan site and not associated with Olympus, Panasonic, or other manufacturers mentioned on this site.
Forum post reactions by Twemoji: https://github.com/twitter/twemoji
Copyright © 2009-2019 Amin Forums, LLC
Top Bottom