Ditch 4/3 14-54 and 50-200 if you got 14/25/45/75 100-300?

Discussion in 'Adapted Lenses' started by oto02, Oct 3, 2013.

  1. oto02

    oto02 Mu-43 Regular

    Jul 24, 2012
    Melbourne, VICTORIA, AU
    Hi guys

    I got in my lenses arsenal a few big bad boys 14-54 and 50-200 pro range. I don’t use them much (maybe not at all) at the moment. I sold my E-3 and with the adapter for m4/3 they sluggish.
    Now, having all these beautiful primes, was wondering if it’s worth it keeping those 4//3 lenses as a good assets? I am aware of their beautiful IQ, but with m4/3 bodies not very convenient though. Not interested in buying EM-1.
    Also all the above primes – gives me outstanding results.

    As a side note, I got PM2, EM-5 and GH2 (hacked) for movies (24p). For movies I got a collection of Nikkor 55 1.2, Konica 50 1.7, 28 3.5 and 135 3.5

    Anyone out there have these lenses and hold on to them? If so why?

  2. hkpzee

    hkpzee Mu-43 All-Pro

    Sep 5, 2011
    Hong Kong
    I have both of those lenses and I am holding onto them for use with the E-M1. Since you have no interest in the E-M1, and Olympus, at least for now, has indicated they will not introduce PDAF in the lower end MFT models, your existing primes + 100-300 collection might serve you better than the 2 4/3 lenses.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.