1. Welcome to Mu-43.com—a friendly Micro 4/3 camera & photography discussion forum!

    If you are thinking of buying a camera or need help with your photos, you will find our forum members full of advice! Click here to join for free!

Dilemma - 12-40 or 12-60 and 50 macro?

Discussion in 'Native Lenses' started by wushumr2, May 8, 2014.

  1. wushumr2

    wushumr2 Mu-43 Regular

    137
    May 20, 2013
    Hey, so I just received the 12-40 zoom to see if I like it more than the 12-60 I've been playing around with (I have an E-M1). Price is somewhat an issue; for the price of the 12-40 I can hang on to both the 12-60 AND my 50 f/2 macro, which is a BIT long but yields great results.

    Upsides to the 12-40:
    1) Balances slightly better on the E-M1 than the 12-60
    2) Focuses a bit closer than the 12-60 (1:3 vs 1:3.6)
    3) Almost exactly one stop faster at 40mm
    4) Manual focus clutch whereas 12-60 has to rely on full time manual focus override

    Downsides to the 12-40:
    1) Price. I got a great deal but it still works out to about twice what I paid for the 12-60
    2) The zoom doesn't seem as smooth at the wide end as the 12-60

    Upsides to the 12-60:
    1) Goes to 60mm, which is handy
    2) Uses 72mm filters, same as the 4/3 9-18
    2.5) Since I'm mainly using the 4/3 9-18, 50mm f2, and occasionally the 4/3 70-300, using the 12-60 would be nice because then I leave the MMF-3 on

    If I were to keep the 12-40 I'd probably sell the 50mm f2; I really like the bokeh of the 50mm and feel that for a lot of objects even f2.8 doesn't yield enough blur. I don't even do THAT much macro but it's a fun lens and I'll probably regret selling it.

    What do you guys think? Any thoughts would be appreciated. And I'll just put it out there: I spent something like $385 on the 12-60 and $325 on the 50mm f2. I got a great deal on the 12-40, but it still comes out to a bit more than those two lenses combined.
     
  2. Wisertime

    Wisertime Mu-43 Hall of Famer

    Aug 6, 2013
    Philly
    Steve
    I have the opposite dilemma. I kinda want the 12-40, but agree on price....had a chance to snap one up for a steal on refurb, but hesitated and lost it...so waiting for that to happen again. I had long sold my 12-60, but picked up another for the E1 I still own, but frankly haven't used it since I got it. I did reluctantly sell my 50mm F2. I love that lens, but figured I could always buy another one if I changed my mind (so far I haven't missed it much). The 60mm & 45 mm do as well though. The 12-60 is big and heavy..more so than I remember. I don't have an adapter, so I haven't tried it w/ the EM5, but I know it would be too top heavy for daily use....for the EM1 it would be better, but still large.

    I have the nice primes (25 F1.4, 45 f1.8, 60mm, 75mm)+12-50 if I need wide and like the smaller lenses now, so not sure I "need" the 12-40..just lusting for it. I sold both my 17mm's feeling they were redundant. I have to decide which of the 60mm & 75mm to keep...don't really need both.

    The 12-60 was once my go to lens, with the 50mm getting the balance of use....but I can't see having it on the EM5. I've also been gradually migrating to longer focal lengths and shooting closer/tighter too.

    I guess if I had the EM1, I wouldn't mind holding onto the 12-60...maybe the 12-40 will come down in price someday and you can snatch one up.
     
  3. dhazeghi

    dhazeghi Mu-43 Hall of Famer Subscribing Member

    Aug 6, 2010
    San Jose, CA
    Dara
    One concern I'd have about the 12-60 is durability. I've had bad luck with the SWD motor dying several times, with different copies of the lens (both with m4/3 and non-m4/3 bodies). Out of warranty, it cost $170 last time, and took about 2 weeks for them to repair.

    As to bokeh, the 50/2 macro is indeed a nice lens, but the slow focusing really killed my enjoyment of it (again, on 4/3). I'd much rather have the 45/1.8 and an adapted manual focus macro. The 45/1.8 small, fast focusing and quite sharp, and with macro, adapting makes focusing much more pleasant (no focus by wire slop).

    Unless I was really strapped for cash, I'd sell the 4/3 lenses. Yes, they're well-made and well-priced, but they just require too many compromises.
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.