DigitalRev reviews the new Olympus 12mm f/2.

Discussion in 'Native Lenses' started by bilzmale, Aug 6, 2011.

  1. bilzmale

    bilzmale Mu-43 All-Pro

    They like it.

    [ame="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YN4I4KcvAL0&feature=player_embedded"]LINK[/ame]:
     
    • Like Like x 4
  2. magicianhisoka

    magicianhisoka Mu-43 Rookie

    17
    Jul 8, 2011
    Singapore
    They pointed out the same problem that everyone sees. The price of that lens hurts for an m4/3.
     
  3. JJJPhoto

    JJJPhoto Mu-43 Veteran

    252
    Jul 8, 2011
    Cincinnati, OH
    Jerry Jackson Jr
    If this was priced between $500 and $700 rather than $799-$899 it would be an even better seller for Olympus. I have zero doubt that the $399 45mm f1.8 lens will sell at least two or three times as many units as the 12mm ... Despite the fact that the 12mm is the better lens. Likewise, I am sure many people interested in the 12mm will end up buying the Panasonic 14mm instead.
     
  4. ~tc~

    ~tc~ Mu-43 Hall of Famer

    Oct 22, 2010
    Houston, TX
    But if they had done the manual focus thing on the 45/1.8, I bet they would have sold 10x as many, even if priced 500-800 USD
     
  5. LovinTheEP2

    LovinTheEP2 Mu-43 Top Veteran

    619
    Feb 15, 2011
    Toronto
    Darn him.. cool review.

    Sounds like the perfect kit would be:

    What a tough call between the 14mm and 20mm straped to a M43.. then the 12mm (think I'd have that kit vs. any of the kit zooms) .. then the 45mm

    Was thinking of a 14mm / 45mm / 75mm-300mm

    now thinking

    12mm / 20mm / 45mm / 75mm-300mm; wait a sec.. talk about some serious mulla

    :confused:
     
    • Like Like x 1
  6. dyrmaker83

    dyrmaker83 Mu-43 Regular

    50
    Feb 19, 2011
    Washington, DC
    Mike
    I still don't see a problem with the price. Back when I had a Nikon D40, I lamented the fact that other than the two kit zooms and the 35mm 1.8, there were no affordable lenses under $400 - particularly primes. With M43, we have the 14mm, 20mm, soon to be 45mm, all with pretty stellar image quality. Life is pretty good I think.

    My guess is that the metal construction and snap focus ring each add significantly to the cost. They could have made the 12mm without those features for probably $300 or so less, but it wouldn't be nearly as cool then would it. I think I'd rather have those things and be able to save up for them.

    I say this, as someone who won't be able to afford one for a loooong time.
     
  7. drizek

    drizek Mu-43 Veteran

    492
    Aug 5, 2011
    The 45 doesn't have the manual focus thing? It is by wire only? That's terrible.
     
  8. jonoslack

    jonoslack Mu-43 Regular Subscribing Member

    33
    Aug 2, 2011
    Always love his reviews - not sure why, and I'm not sure that they're useful, I just like the quirkiness.

    I also love the lens!
     
  9. RT_Panther

    RT_Panther Mu-43 Legend

    May 4, 2011
    Texas
    So what you're saying is that you want the 45 to be just like the 12 but you don't want to pay a price like the 12....
     
  10. Danny_Two

    Danny_Two Mu-43 Regular

    182
    Oct 30, 2010
    London
    I want one now.
    :frown:
     
  11. Does the manual focus arrangement really account for the premium price? Doesn't disengaging the focus-by-wire in favour of a mechanical focus make it...just like any other non m4/3 and 4/3 lens on earth?

    The lens itself looks great. I just wish Kai would use some form of strap when he tests cameras. It's like watching someone drive without a seatbelt...
     
    • Like Like x 1
  12. twmangrove

    twmangrove Mu-43 Regular

    120
    May 8, 2011
    The Shuswap, B.C.
    Digital Rev's more recent review comparing the new NEX to the E-P3 and the G3 for manual focusing is pretty fun too. Kai definitely seems to prefer the finer things.
     
  13. RT_Panther

    RT_Panther Mu-43 Legend

    May 4, 2011
    Texas
    It's a combination of those plus the metal build...
     
  14. ZephyrZ33

    ZephyrZ33 Mu-43 Top Veteran

    685
    Nov 18, 2010
    Southern California
    I thought I was the only one bothered by that. I guess, it's understandable if you're trying to sell/review a product without other distracting ornaments.

    A friend of mine's has been shooting for over a decade now and he doesn't believe in any straps. I always envision his 5D just taking a nasty tumble.
     
  15. DHart

    DHart Mu-43 Hall of Famer

    Jan 7, 2010
    Scottsdale, Arizona
    Don
    This lens looks like it would be a great lens for the m4/3 kit.
     
  16. Linh

    Linh Mu-43 All-Pro Subscribing Member

    Apr 14, 2009
    Maryland, US
    it is =)


    More than likely the price will drop by $100 by winter. or more. right now, it's just hte early adopter fee. not sure it was worth it, but I much prefer it over the 14 purely because it's a 12, heh.
     
  17. DHart

    DHart Mu-43 Hall of Famer

    Jan 7, 2010
    Scottsdale, Arizona
    Don
    I love the 24mm field of view, the speed, the sharpness, the build quality, the manual focus. I think it is a home run. Will confirm as I get some camera time with it.
     
  18. Amin Sabet

    Amin Sabet Administrator

    Apr 10, 2009
    Boston, MA (USA)
    Yup, I really enjoyed this one :biggrin:.

    <embed src="https://www.youtube.com/v/1p896tm9haU?version=3&amp;hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="560" height="349" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed>
     
    • Like Like x 2
Loading...
Similar Threads Forum Date
Panasonic Leica DG 12-60mm f2.8-4 Review By Mathieu Gasquet Native Lenses Mar 17, 2017
Panasonic Leica 12-60 test/review Native Lenses Feb 16, 2017
Buy from Wex Photographic or risk the DigitalRev dodgy warranty? Native Lenses Aug 29, 2014
DigitalRev reviews Olympus 17mm f1.8 Native Lenses Mar 22, 2013
DigitalRev's PL25 Review Native Lenses Oct 31, 2011