did sony just kill the pen f?

[drd1135]

Yeah, but they don't represent the entire range of professional photographers, and never did.

I agree completely. The street photographer and his Leica or her Rollei are obvious other cases. Just looking for this image produced a huge range of examples.

 

[Geos]

No touch screen, no IBIS, no thanks. I'm hoping the E-M1 II will be a game changer with hand held HD mode.

 

[RDM]

. . . . . i'm having a hard time seeing why anyone should spend more on a pen f than the sony a6300. . .

It is only more expensive for those who have never invested in either system.
But there is a bigger, better and cheaper lens stable in the micro four thirds system.

 

[Ian.]

This is another "Angst" thread that pops up here from time to time.

If any manufacturer brings out some new and exciting enhancement, it is always good for photography. It increases your choice and it increases the likelihood that the enhancement will appear in other cameras and systems.

Nothing negative has happened. So get out and enjoy it.

 

[Speedliner]

The a6000 has been a very successful camera. Whatever we think of it, the broader market loves it, compares it most often to MFT high-end. I'm sure the a6300 will remain very popular.

 

[fsuscotphoto]

This type of thread annoys me no end. If you aren't even thinking about the Pen-F why worry about that Sony, or any Sony? Why worry at all? There is 15 minutes I won't get back.