Comparison: Voigtlander 25mm .95 (E-M1) / Sigma 35mm 1.4+Speedbooster (E-M1) / Nikon 50mm 1.4 (D800)

Arvin

Mu-43 Regular
Hey Guys,

I've shot some comparisons in case anyone is curious about the different in depth of field when wide open.

comparison.jpg



Here are high res:
Voigtlander 25mm .95 (E-M1) @200 ISO

Sigma Art 35mm 1.4 + Metabones Speedbooster (50mm field of view) @200 ISO

Nikon 50mm 1.4G (D800) @ 200ISO


Looks like the Voigtlander is a little softer (as expected) with some chromatic aberration....perhaps I was a little off focus on the flower pattern? The Sigma 35mm renders beautifully with the speedboster with a very similar depth of field. The Nikon still has more subject isolation.
 
Top