Changing the Lumix 35-100 f2.8 for Zuiko 50-200mm f/2.8-3.5 ED SWD?

zulfur666

Mu-43 Veteran
Joined
Jan 30, 2014
Messages
254
I debating if its worth changing my current Lumix 35-100 2.8 to the Zuiko 50-200mm f/2.8-3.5 ED SWD with adapter on my E-M1. While I like the image quality and focus speed a LOT of the Lumix mounted on my E-M1, I find myself sometimes perhaps 50% of the time wanting more reach. Wish there was a 1.4x or even 2x extender like Olympus made once for 4/3 lenses.
BUT the MIGHT of the 4/3 lens is MUCH larger and also weighs more than twice as much. Perhaps wait for the release of the new 40-150 2.8 from Olympus?
Any thoughts anyone went through the same dilemma? Can you share your experiences please?
 

nstelemark

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
May 28, 2013
Messages
3,305
Location
Halifax, Nova Scotia Canada
Real Name
Larry
The 40-150 is going to be roughly the same size as the 50-200. And, unfortunately, there has been no TC announcement for m43.

The EC1.4 works well on the 50-200. The EC20 needs light and a tripod and the fastest aperture at the long end is f7 (at 800 effective of course). You can get some good results from this combo but it is not easy:

50-200+EC20 @400 f7 1/640

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


The 90-250 and 300 f2.8 are better choices with the EC20.
 

zulfur666

Mu-43 Veteran
Joined
Jan 30, 2014
Messages
254
Thanks, I don't think I would use the 50-200 with a TC as 400mm (FF equiv) is more than sufficient for me. What bothers me (perhaps is only the pure spec that bothers) not sure if it makes a REAL difference in real life photos is the quick change away from f2.8. Shooting birds or monkeys in the rain forest every bit of light sensitivity is desired.
50 to 54mm —– f/2.8
55 to 59mm —–f/2.9
60 to 69mm —–f/3.0
70 to 83mm —–f/3.1
84 to 104mm—-f/3.2
105mm to 130mm — f/3.3
131mm to 169mm — f/3.4
170mm to 200mm — f/3.5
 

bassman

Mu-43 All-Pro
Joined
Apr 22, 2013
Messages
1,057
Location
New Jersey
Real Name
The Bassman
I have the 50-200 and only bring it out for special occasions - I find it too big to lug around (like my Nikon 80-200/2.8) "just in case". But if I'm shooting a grandkid's ball game or recital, it's there. I paid about $500 a few months ago and I'm very pleased.
 

nstelemark

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
May 28, 2013
Messages
3,305
Location
Halifax, Nova Scotia Canada
Real Name
Larry
It is certainly not small especially with the EC20:

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


But it fits in my Hadley Small with a 12-35, two TCs, a PL25 and an E-PM1 with a P14 mounted without any trouble. The Manfrotto CX055 Pro is much much larger
 
Links on this page may be to our affiliates. Sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
Mu-43 is a fan site and not associated with Olympus, Panasonic, or other manufacturers mentioned on this site.
Forum post reactions by Twemoji: https://github.com/twitter/twemoji
Copyright © 2009-2019 Amin Forums, LLC
Top Bottom