I am looking for advice. I currently have an XSI and 50 1.4 lens. In the past I have owned the E-PL1 and E-PL2. I really love Canon and Olympus. I might keep my Canon setup, but in all honesty I would like to move to a single system. I used to shoot RAW, but these days I tend to shoot JPEG most of the time. Canon JPEGs from the XSI are actually very good. I am familiar with Olympus JPEGs which are also very good. One thing I miss about my Olympus was the CDAF and IBIS. I never had front focus or back focus and every shot was in focus, something more difficult to get with my Canon setup. On the other hand, the Canon XSI has wonderful color and tonality and white balance, though the formula is 'different' from the Olympus process. I would rather have a smaller camera with more accurate focusing, so the OM-D is on my short list. I guess I question whether I will be able to take pictures as good as the 'ole XSI and still have some shallow DO (Keep in mind I only ever used the fantastic 20 1.7 on my EPL1 and EPL2 setup). I have also tossed around the idea of picking up the EPL2 again. It's cheap and I think it's the most attractive camera I have ever owned (in black). I have uploaded a sample OOC JPEG taken with my XSI and 50 1.4 wide-open. Will I be able to achieve the same result if not better with the OMD ? Thoughts ?