can't handle dpreview anymore

T N Args

Agent Photocateur
Joined
Dec 3, 2013
Messages
3,507
Location
Adelaide, Australia
Real Name
call me Arg
.... the "equivalence brigade", is completely out of hand. Equivalence is wielded like a club to beat people down, if you don't toe the FF is the best format in every regard line. I don't think the site owners openly condone it, but various members of the moderation, and administration staff definitely appear to turn a blind eye, when certain members go trolling, or harass non FF users.
I have had offline discussions with one of the µ4/3 mods there. He says the DPR Editor in Chief has instructed them that 'no valid topic can be prohibited' and that also applies to equivalence. So their hands are tied.

In fact, the mods have to admonish or warn frustrated µ4/3 members who try to tell the bullies to go away, on the basis that they are trying to prevent a valid topic from being discussed.

I think this has happened because the editor is valuing freedom of speech above unsociable behaviour, unless it is direct personal insults. I can understand this, but the end result is unenjoyable for many people who, like girls, just wanna have fun.
 

NCV

Mu-43 Veteran
Joined
Mar 9, 2016
Messages
406
Location
Italy
Real Name
Nigel
I have had offline discussions with one of the µ4/3 mods there. He says the DPR Editor in Chief has instructed them that 'no valid topic can be prohibited' and that also applies to equivalence. So their hands are tied.

In fact, the mods have to admonish or warn frustrated µ4/3 members who try to tell the bullies to go away, on the basis that they are trying to prevent a valid topic from being discussed.

I think this has happened because the editor is valuing freedom of speech above unsociable behaviour, unless it is direct personal insults. I can understand this, but the end result is unenjoyable for many people who, like girls, just wanna have fun.

I am not the only one then that thinks that way.

The moderation has become very heavy handed and I have just got a 7 day ban for this reply which I thought was quite innocent: " the only infallible person I know lives in Rome" when I replied to one of the leading proponents of “Equivalence” who does not even own a M43 camera but trolls the forum frequently.

I get the sensation that a lot of bans are being handed out at the moment to try and “clean up” the forum.

It is becoming absolute madness on that forum and I have noticed many regular “names” have disappeared of late and thus the quality of the discussion has plummeted.
 

Egregius V

Mu-43 Top Veteran
Joined
Jun 14, 2015
Messages
659
Location
Massachusetts, USA
Real Name
Rev. Gregory Vozzo
Equivalence seems a valid enough subject for discussion - especially if one is used to "full frame" format cameras. (What a misnomer - "medium format" is bigger.) While I don't personally care about it, I want to try to respect those who do. So I'm appalled whenever someone drops an e-bomb into a discussion that's perfectly fine without it or bullies other people for engaging in discussions they don't care about. :shakehead: It's so unhelpful and goes against what a discussion forum is really all about.
 

NCV

Mu-43 Veteran
Joined
Mar 9, 2016
Messages
406
Location
Italy
Real Name
Nigel
The equivalence problem on the DPR M43 forum is not the subject of equivalence, but the little band of bullies who at the slightest excuse wish to ram their views down everyone else’s throats. It is the arrogance of how they write their posts that gets me with a series of sarcastic putdowns for those who challenge their views.

The lead bully is a Physics teacher in “real life”. I sure feel sorry for his students if he acts in class in the same way he acts online.

But the thing that gets me is that one of the Mods seems to encourage this guy in particular whilst at best deleting posts opposing his views and I get the feeling that quite a few bans have been handed out recently.

Anyway this forum that I looked around before joining seems far more civil and relaxed.
 
Joined
Dec 2, 2014
Messages
5,935
Location
Knoxville, TN
When I was shopping around before buying to m4/3 I used DPR for research, including the forums. I posted a few questions, and in a few other threads.

As soon as I bought, though, I went straight here. Much better info, and much better people, with lots and lots of great example images. I don't even look at the DPR forums anymore.
 

DanS

Mu-43 All-Pro
Joined
Mar 8, 2016
Messages
1,760
I think this has happened because the editor is valuing freedom of speech above unsociable behaviour, unless it is direct personal insults.
Thats something I had a discussion with one of the mods about when I first joined because I had concerns. They key instigators, have worked around the rules by making everything a thinly veiled or backhanded insult.

So I'm appalled whenever someone drops an e-bomb into a discussion that's perfectly fine without it or bullies other people for engaging in discussions they don't care about. :shakehead: It's so unhelpful and goes against what a discussion forum is really all about.
Yep, this is exactly what I've seen. A thread starts about something not even remotely related to equivalence, and then one of a small sect of users contorts it into an equivalence debate, and then everything hits the fan.

The lead bully is a Physics teacher in “real life”. I sure feel sorry for his students if he acts in class in the same way he acts online.
I know exactly who you are talking about, and one of the mods told me he can get away with it, because "he has the support of some highly placed Admins at DPR."
 

carlosfm

Mu-43 Veteran
Joined
Oct 3, 2015
Messages
230
Location
Lisbon, Portugal
There will come a time when sensor equivalence/size will be measured against m4/3 or some other smaller size because "full frame" will be considered way too big to be practical and so last century...
Mine is bigger than yours doesn't work for all things.
 

Schwert

Mu-43 Regular
Joined
Mar 2, 2016
Messages
158
Location
Pacific NW
Let me just say I am glad this thread has not died...

When I could not stomach the idea of joining DPR I wondered if I was the only one who thought the general nastiness and seemingly intentional fight picking was normal behaviour on such sites.

I did learn a few things over there, but it was very tough work sorting through the junk to find a rare gem.

Nice to be here...
 

bigboysdad

Mu-43 All-Pro
Joined
Aug 25, 2013
Messages
1,645
Location
Sydney/ London
Is someone going to identify this physics teacher then? (Even his forum name, that'll do). Would love to have a read of his posts.
 

gr6825

Mu-43 Veteran
Joined
Oct 10, 2012
Messages
277
There will come a time when sensor equivalence/size will be measured against m4/3 or some other smaller size because "full frame" will be considered way too big to be practical and so last century...
Sorry but this embodies the mixed message I see sometimes in this forum. It is okay to "kick up" against the larger formats, but comments about M43 limitations are "bullying." On the one hand, I get this is a M43 forum so there is going to be more M43 loving. At the same time, it just sounds to me like some people are more interested in validation than a robust discussion about pros and cons. I admit, I am often motivated to chime in when I see statements I consider to be overly broad or optimistic (e.g. 'there is really no practical advantage to a larger sensor'). Maybe this is part of what goes on at DPR? Anyway, my personal take: if you say your thing is the best, prepare for contrarians to come out of the woodwork and say "not so fast." More fun to have differences of opinion, I think :)
 

tkbslc

Super Moderator
Joined
Feb 6, 2015
Messages
7,554
Location
Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Sorry but this embodies the mixed message I see sometimes in this forum. It is okay to "kick up" against the larger formats, but comments about M43 limitations are "bullying." On the one hand, I get this is a M43 forum so there is going to be more M43 loving. At the same time, it just sounds to me like some people are more interested in validation than a robust discussion about pros and cons. I admit, I am often motivated to chime in when I see statements I consider to be overly broad or optimistic (e.g. 'there is really no practical advantage to a larger sensor'). Maybe this is part of what goes on at DPR? Anyway, my personal take: if you say your thing is the best, prepare for contrarians to come out of the woodwork and say "not so fast." More fun to have differences of opinion, I think :)
I absolutely agree. I find it quite ridiculous to see people trying claim that a 300mm f4 on an E-M1 is directly comparable to a 600mm f4 on a Nikon D4. "Look I can get the same thing and it's 1/3 the size!" Those kind of statements beg for someone to comment on equivalence.

What I hate is when a m4/3 only discussion is invaded by people who have to point out the "true" FF equivalent and how you must be dumb to shoot such equivalently slow lenses. For example, someone is sharing some nice stuff from the 35-100 2.8 and someone has to pop in and say how it is overpriced for an f5.6 lens or some nonsense. Or every product announcement for m4/3 has more comments mentioning the crop factor than anything else.
 

Turbofrog

Mu-43 Legend
Joined
Mar 21, 2014
Messages
5,362
I absolutely agree. I find it quite ridiculous to see people trying claim that a 300mm f4 on an E-M1 is directly comparable to a 600mm f4 on a Nikon D4. "Look I can get the same thing and it's 1/3 the size!" Those kind of statements beg for someone to comment on equivalence.
I agree, it's clearly not at all the same...but can you imagine the FF shooters that would be kicking down the door if there was a compact, lightweight, affordable, weather-sealed, optically stellar 600mm/f8 available?

I use equivalence theory regularly and understand its implications (and also its significant practical limitations) but it's no surprise that people are bound to get on the defensive when pompous snobs browbeat them with half-facts all the time. The super annoying thing is that it's always a "have it both ways" conversation. On wide angles, a 17mm/f1.8 is a "crazy overpriced 35mm/f3.6" but with telephotos, a 300mm/f4 is only compared against a 300mm/f4 "because you can crop." It's garbage.

Not enough picture taking, too much abstracted measurebation. And I'm much too easily suckered into it...
 

Turbofrog

Mu-43 Legend
Joined
Mar 21, 2014
Messages
5,362
I must have a poor memory. I thought the O300 was priced above $2k ;)
Everything's relative, right? Especially affordability. What do the other 600mm primes on the market cost?

Heck, even the Sigma 150-600/f6.3 Sports costs $1800 and weighs 2.9 kg...
 

Gerard

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
May 12, 2015
Messages
3,757
Location
Vleuten, Utrecht
In the current season of House of Cards, someone snaps a photo of a (I guess) 10x15 cm print using a smartphone and has this file bown up to bilboard size.
How is that for equivalence?

If you only spend 2 minutes on how sensors differ, you know this cannot be true. But nobody cares.....
 

Andym72

Mu-43 Veteran
Joined
Mar 4, 2013
Messages
386
Location
Reading, UK
When the E-M5 won camera of the year by public vote at the end of 2012, and all hell broke loose as the "we have big cameras, we know best" crowd piled into the m43 forum to insult the "petty" m43 community for "rigging the vote", I knew I couldn't use the forums on DPR any more, the constant attacking had got too much for me. Fortunately I'd already found this place.

Good god, from what some of you are saying, it's descended further, which I hardly though possible.

I go there just for the news and reviews now, and just avoid scrolling down to the comments section, which is equally contaminated with, frankly, jerks.

Tedolf was always good for a laugh though (or to laugh at, should I say...)
 

TonyG

Mu-43 Top Veteran
Joined
Oct 15, 2012
Messages
628
Location
Ontario Canada
Sorry but this embodies the mixed message I see sometimes in this forum. It is okay to "kick up" against the larger formats, but comments about M43 limitations are "bullying." On the one hand, I get this is a M43 forum so there is going to be more M43 loving. At the same time, it just sounds to me like some people are more interested in validation than a robust discussion about pros and cons. I admit, I am often motivated to chime in when I see statements I consider to be overly broad or optimistic (e.g. 'there is really no practical advantage to a larger sensor'). Maybe this is part of what goes on at DPR? Anyway, my personal take: if you say your thing is the best, prepare for contrarians to come out of the woodwork and say "not so fast." More fun to have differences of opinion, I think :)
I enjoy a good discussion also but what is going on at DP isn't respectful.
 
Links on this page may be to our affiliates. Sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
Mu-43 is a fan site and not associated with Olympus, Panasonic, or other manufacturers mentioned on this site.
Forum post reactions by Twemoji: https://github.com/twitter/twemoji
Copyright © 2009-2019 Amin Forums, LLC
Top Bottom