Can't focus on far away objects with adapted lense.

gummyrabbit

Mu-43 Regular
Joined
Sep 15, 2010
Messages
29
I just got a Nikon lens adapter for my GF1 from Rainbow on eBay. I put a Nikkor 50mm AF F/1.8 lens on it and it seems to work fine until I try to focus on something (e.g. a building across a street) that's far away. I turn the focusing ring right to the limit and the building is still out of focus. Is this normal because of the adapter?
 

deirdre

Mu-43 Top Veteran
Joined
Aug 9, 2010
Messages
661
My guess is it's the adapter. Most of them focus past infinity. Back it off a little bit and you should be able to focus.
 

pdh

Mu-43 Top Veteran
Joined
May 6, 2010
Messages
598
try backing the focus off a bit from infinity and see if that improves things ... many of the adapters seem to be like this ...
 

PeterB666

Mu-43 Top Veteran
Joined
Jan 14, 2010
Messages
780
Location
Tura Beach, Australia
Real Name
Peter
I have 2 different types of adapter for different types of lens. Neither of them focus correctly at infinity so very small apertures and lots of sharpening are used when trying to focus beyond infinity. It prooved pretty frustrating when trying to do stuff like focus on the moon with an Olympus OM 200mm f/4 lens.
 

Brianetta

Mu-43 Veteran
Joined
Sep 5, 2010
Messages
438
Location
North East England
Real Name
Brian Ronald
My Pentax adapter is shorter than it needs to be, guaranteeing infinity focus by allowing the lens to focus past it. I lose a whole two centimetres at the near end for that. It's not like we're adapting like for like in terms of flange distance, so there's really no excuse for no infinity focus on any type of 135 format lens.
 

Dunkeld

Mu-43 Regular
Joined
Jul 24, 2010
Messages
94
As indicated.

As indicated by others here you just need to learn not to rely on infinity being sharp. I have the same problem with my Canon EF 50 F 1/8. I just manually focus by eye until it is sharp. As the guy said, just back of a tad.

Dave T.
 

brnmatsumoto

Mu-43 Regular
Joined
Jul 18, 2010
Messages
92
Location
Los Angeles, CA
adapter

This is an interesting thread in that I often wondered if the expensive adapters made by Voigtlander and Novoflex were made to higher tolerances and justified their higher price. I ran a test with a Nikon 105 mm Nikon and at infinity with the Voigtlander, the "infinity" image of a neighbors roof was in focus. But with my old Nikon F adapter, purchased from eBay, a year ago, setting the lens to the infinity mark did not work. As several people wrote, you have to focus just short of the infinity mark with the less expensive adapter.

As an aside, I had used the eBay adapter with my G1 and GH1 and it seemed fine. But now with my G2, it seems somewhat finicky. It will occasionally cause the camera to give rise to the message that the lens not securely mounted or it gives a black screen. With a little jiggling, it gives an image and is workable. An annoying "feature". I wonder if my G2 is just a little bit more touchy about adapters than my G1. Anyone else observe this?

Brian
 

gummyrabbit

Mu-43 Regular
Joined
Sep 15, 2010
Messages
29
As an aside, I had used the eBay adapter with my G1 and GH1 and it seemed fine. But now with my G2, it seems somewhat finicky. It will occasionally cause the camera to give rise to the message that the lens not securely mounted or it gives a black screen. With a little jiggling, it gives an image and is workable. An annoying "feature". I wonder if my G2 is just a little bit more touchy about adapters than my G1. Anyone else observe this?

Brian
It sounds like the adapter is touching the electrical contacts for the lens when there should be no contact at all.
 

brnmatsumoto

Mu-43 Regular
Joined
Jul 18, 2010
Messages
92
Location
Los Angeles, CA
You could very well be correct. In any case, the Nikon F adapter is not being used--the Voigtlander adapter has taken its place. Its just as well, I want to try some astronomical shots of the Milky Way and being able to set infinity focus by using the stop will simplify this task.

I have to wait for the spring though. LA does not have clear enough skies to justify a long time exposure:frown:

Brian
 
Links on this page may be to our affiliates. Sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
Mu-43 is a fan site and not associated with Olympus, Panasonic, or other manufacturers mentioned on this site.
Forum post reactions by Twemoji: https://github.com/twitter/twemoji
Copyright © 2009-2019 Amin Forums, LLC
Top Bottom