Canon FD lenses...not much love here, and I just...can't

[ektar]

Up 2---I have to give some serious cred: To the makers of the video, and to those who invested an hour 24 into watching it. I'll have to do it in installments.

 

[blumoon722]

Took this pic of Izzy inside this morning with Canon FD 35mm 1:2 S.S.C. on my G-7

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

 

[alex g]

Took this pic of Izzy inside this morning with Canon FD 35mm 1:2 S.S.C. on my G-7

View attachment 860802

Preposterously cute creature. Nice pic too!

 

[wyk]

Here's some found footage I made in to a video today. From when I used to volunteer in a dog rescue full time in 2014.
Used a Canon 50mm F1.8 FD lens and an Olympus EPL2

 

[ektar]

Okay, since I’ve found some FD fans, who’d like to opine on the FD 28/2.8 S.C. Vs the NFD 28/2.8?

 

[Tim Murphy]

Dear Board,

Here is a picture from one year ago today of my recently departed best friend. Taken with an EPL-2 and Canon 50mm f1.8 FD. I wish I had shot it at f4 instead of f1.8, but it turned out pretty well. I'll never forget you Bearman!

Regards,

Tim Murphy

Harrisburg, PA

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

 

[ektar]

^^^^^
Sorry, Tim.

 

[alex g]

Lovely, soulful portrait. I think that f/1.8 really helps to draw the viewer into the volumes being spoken silently through his eyes, particularly his left. F/4 might have got his nose more in focus, but likely at the expense of that tremendous sense of connection you captured. Very sorry for your loss.

 

[edmsnap]

Okay, since I’ve found some FD fans, who’d like to opine on the FD 28/2.8 S.C. Vs the NFD 28/2.8?

The 28s were not the stars in the FD world. I own almost all of the FD lenses and multiples of many. I recommend the FDn over the FD generally speaking. People malign the polycarbonate bodies, but I can say with confidence that they last very well and fail less. Their lightness also matches m43 better.

I'd skip the 28s altogether and go for a 24. Way better lenses. The 24/2.0 is my favourite lens to put on m43 hands down, adapted or otherwise.

Whenever I use the 20/2.8 I'm always impressed. It's a lens that can't take a bad picture it seems. I'd also throw it on the recommendation pile.

 

[ektar]

The 28s were not the stars in the FD world. I own almost all of the FD lenses and multiples of many. I recommend the FDn over the FD generally speaking. People malign the polycarbonate bodies, but I can say with confidence that they last very well and fail less. Their lightness also matches m43 better.

That matches with what I've read, 28 vs 24. I also read some pretty solid opinions on the FDn, especially vs the pre-S.S.C. FDs.

I'd skip the 28s altogether and go for a 24. Way better lenses. The 24/2.0 is my favourite lens to put on m43 hands down, adapted or otherwise.

Whenever I use the 20/2.8 I'm always impressed. It's a lens that can't take a bad picture it seems. I'd also throw it on the recommendation pile.

Thx!