1. Welcome to Mu-43.com—a friendly Micro 4/3 camera & photography discussion forum!

    If you are thinking of buying a camera or need help with your photos, you will find our forum members full of advice! Click here to join for free!

Canon 70-300 IS

Discussion in 'Adapted Lenses' started by coreyb, Apr 19, 2010.

  1. coreyb

    coreyb Mu-43 Rookie

    13
    Apr 18, 2010
    cambridge
    hey there folks... recent dslr convert and i'm definitely selling all my ef lenses but am thinking about keeping the 70-300 IS around for telephoto and getting an adapter. i know i'll lose aperture control and autofocus but thinking it might be worth it? or should i sell it and my kit lens and pickup the new 14-150? i'm thinking the lumix 20mm will be on my e-pl1 90% of the time and 300mm should be plenty of reach for my taste... thoughts?
     
  2. grum

    grum Mu-43 Regular

    104
    Apr 2, 2010
    There is a 4/3 Zuiko 70-300 I think - with the adapter it will still allow autofocus etc
     
  3. coreyb

    coreyb Mu-43 Rookie

    13
    Apr 18, 2010
    cambridge
    interesting... i'm really thinking that i'll either keep the canon 70-300 or sell it and the kit lens and pickup the oly 14-150 (if it gets stellar reviews) though...
     
  4. kevinparis

    kevinparis Cantankerous Scotsman Subscribing Member

    Feb 12, 2010
    Gent, Belgium
    remember at the 300 end it will look like a 600mm lens - not easy to handhold that on an ep-1 - image stabilisation is good...but not that good!!!

    K
     
  5. adam

    adam Mu-43 Regular

    68
    Apr 21, 2010
    Maryland
    You will lose not only AF and aperture control, but also the image stabilizer, which is the biggest advantage of the 70-300 IS (possibly second to the image quality).

    You'd probably do better to sell the 70-300 IS and get the Olympus 70-300 and the mFT-FT adapter. It won't autofocus quickly, but it should get there eventually. And the image quality isn't quite as good, but it's close, and unlike the 70-300 IS you'd be able to stop down for additional sharpness if the light is good.
     
  6. WT21

    WT21 Mu-43 Legend Subscribing Member

    Feb 19, 2010
    Boston
    I had that lens (just sold my 5D and gear). Personally, I think the lens is too big for m43. I've got the Panny 45-200, and at 200mm, it's a pain to frame. 300 will be killer without a tripod I would think, and the body might have a hard time holding that lens, so you'd need a lens tripod mount, and do they make one for 70-300?, etc.

    On a related note, I've had the 55-250 (on an XSi) and 70-300 (on a 5D). The 45-200 is as good as the 55-250 on the XSi was. The 70-300 was better than both, but that was on a 5D, which might have had something to do with it.

    Any rate, you might consider trying it for yourself, but I have my doubts. Good luck!
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.