Showcase Canon 200mm f4 newFD

pellicle

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
Feb 10, 2010
Messages
3,956
Location
Killarney, OzTrailEYa
Real Name
pellicle
Hi

this little lens is among the most compact 200mm f4 lenses around. It is actually different to the earlier 200mm f4 as it focuses by IF (Inner Focus) methods (now more or less common in AF lenses) and does not extend during focus (as does the older version).

It weighs in nicely at 440g

Among my first ever shots with this lens was this one

3961171729_1acf567d59_o.jpg
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


the lens is actually a nice size on a EVF body

FD-200.jpg
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


it is not much longer than the native 45-200 Panasonic lens even when on an adapter.
theTwo.jpg
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


but of course the Pana lens extends when zooming to 200mm making it similar in length
200Extended.jpg
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


The 200mm f4 has higher transmission than the Pana, so even though you set both to f5.6 (which is as wide open as the 45-200 gets) it transmits an extra 1.5 or so stops (meaning higher shutter for the same other settings).

The lens has an integrated lens hood which can slide out when the lens cap is removed

Some other shots (all taken at f4)

3961171813_d026aa4aa0_o.jpg
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


My observation is that its a wee bit "soft" at f4 when compared to modern lenses but at f5.6 is very sweet.

At $50~60 for good examples its a great lens for those who are wondering about "will I use a telephoto" and can take some great shots.

one of my favorites is this one

4874787981_3fcb7d073d_b.jpg
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)
 

Jason Stamper

Mu-43 Veteran
Joined
Mar 13, 2014
Messages
217
Hey that looks great, I have a 135mm fd and was thinking about this 200mm to get a little more reach. How do you find this lens to be without image stabilization? I know it'd be fine with a tripod, just not sure about hand held. Thanks.
 

pellicle

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
Feb 10, 2010
Messages
3,956
Location
Killarney, OzTrailEYa
Real Name
pellicle
How do you find this lens to be without image stabilization? I know it'd be fine with a tripod, just not sure about hand held. Thanks.
all these shots are hand held with no stabilisation.

Sorry I didn't see this till now but if you'd quoted me I'd have got a notification (like you may be getting)

Another shot hand held in lowish light.

curlew3.jpg
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)
 

pellicle

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
Feb 10, 2010
Messages
3,956
Location
Killarney, OzTrailEYa
Real Name
pellicle
Kea (New Zealand)

24106867667_8825b4041a_o.jpg
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

nFD200f4 & GH1
 

pellicle

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
Feb 10, 2010
Messages
3,956
Location
Killarney, OzTrailEYa
Real Name
pellicle
Finally got good light on this one

P1120974-01.jpeg
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


But the atmospheric haze dulls the bits close to the horizon
 

Pilote12

Mu-43 Rookie
Joined
Oct 19, 2018
Messages
15
Location
Millau, France
At minimum distance, no crop
_7016406-3.jpg
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)
 

Pilote12

Mu-43 Rookie
Joined
Oct 19, 2018
Messages
15
Location
Millau, France
_6246252-3.jpg
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)
 

Pilote12

Mu-43 Rookie
Joined
Oct 19, 2018
Messages
15
Location
Millau, France
_8037759-3.jpg
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)
 

Pilote12

Mu-43 Rookie
Joined
Oct 19, 2018
Messages
15
Location
Millau, France
_7126646-3.jpg
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)
 

Latest threads

Top Bottom