Can we use the "newer" Nikon/Canon, etc lenses?

atrac7

Mu-43 Rookie
Joined
Jan 13, 2011
Messages
18
I read a lot about us using "legacy" lenses for our MFT cameras...question is, what about the current lenses out there for Nikon (or other brands)? Are there limitations with using such lenses or is it really just open game for our cameras as long as we have the proper adapter?

Also, more specifically for those who know Nikon, how many variations of mounts do their lenses use? I have one Nikon adapter that is meant for their bayonet or "F" series lenses. I DO know that the "G" series lenses require a different mount.

Thanks all,

-atrac
 

Kade.Sirin

Mu-43 Regular
Joined
Sep 23, 2010
Messages
47
Location
Las Vegas
The issue with more modern lenses is that they don't have any physical adjustment for the aperture.

With modern glass, you'll be shooting wide open.
 

atrac7

Mu-43 Rookie
Joined
Jan 13, 2011
Messages
18
The issue with more modern lenses is that they don't have any physical adjustment for the aperture.

With modern glass, you'll be shooting wide open.
Thanks...so most (modern) do not have a the physical aperture ring.


Is this pretty much the norm with all of the newer type lenses? Or are there some glass out there that still utilize a physical aperture ring? (in terms of newer lenses)
 

iliakoltsov

Mu-43 Regular
Joined
Aug 7, 2010
Messages
195
Location
Paris
Well with expensive adapters yes, I know there is a KA- emulation micro 4/3 adapter, aparently there is an eos one as well. Why everyone is prefering legacy lenses is the fact that it is more convenient to adapt. ALL legacy lenses have an aperture ring hence they can work more or less independently from the camera. Modern lenses are on the other hand more electronic based so you need to fool the electronics before you get anywhere hence the useability is more restricted or the adapter is more expensive.
 
Joined
Oct 9, 2010
Messages
7,397
Location
Brisbane, Australia
Real Name
Nic
You can buy lovely legacy lenses that work perfectly well on m4/3 bodies for very little money, where the only alternative to use that lens is on an old film camera. You could also use expensive modern lenses that are crippled without the required electronic connection to the body, where the alternative is to use those same lenses on modern digital cameras that are at least as good as your m4/3 camera and give you aperture control, autofocus, etc.
 

iliakoltsov

Mu-43 Regular
Joined
Aug 7, 2010
Messages
195
Location
Paris
LuckyPenguin i totally agree with you concerning the price of legacy lenses as opposed to more modern ones. Some legacy lenses can be found for less than a coffee in starbucks and they are more than decent.
 

capt3450

New to Mu-43
Joined
Dec 29, 2010
Messages
8
Yep, you can use (sort of) all the new Canon (EF) and Nikon G lenses as long as you acquire a right adapter, they are pricey but work. For Canon's lens you may need to have a Canon body to start with, since their lens need aperture initializing to start with.
-capt3450

I read a lot about us using "legacy" lenses for our MFT cameras...question is, what about the current lenses out there for Nikon (or other brands)? Are there limitations with using such lenses or is it really just open game for our cameras as long as we have the proper adapter?

Also, more specifically for those who know Nikon, how many variations of mounts do their lenses use? I have one Nikon adapter that is meant for their bayonet or "F" series lenses. I DO know that the "G" series lenses require a different mount.

Thanks all,

-atrac
 

usayit

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
Jul 2, 2010
Messages
2,964
Location
Some call it the arm pit of NYC.
well Kipon just released a EOS to m43 adapter with built-in 14 aperture blades, so it is possible to use EF lens now
Have you used one yet? I'd like to hear some input from a user.

There's a big difference between an aperture diaphragm (in lens) and simply placing an adjustable opening behind the rear element. Without using one myself, I would guess the later would simply act more as a "mask" of sorts. You'd probably have better results from placing the aperture diaphragm in front of the front element.... much like the earlier versions of the lensbaby (magnetic washers).


In general, EOS/EF lenses are tough to use because there is no way to adjust the electronic in-lens aperture diaphragm. I heard you can attach the lens to an EOS body, stop down the lens (DOF preview) and then remove the lens from camera. The aperture diaphragm will stay stopped down but that means you are stuck at that aperture. Not really practical.

That aside, most of the modern lenses are not damped for easy manual focus either.
 

atrac7

Mu-43 Rookie
Joined
Jan 13, 2011
Messages
18
Thanks for all your input guys

AT the moment I am fine with my basic adapter for Nikon--currently have the 50mm 1.8, 105mm (2.5 or 2.8, can't remember) and 28mm 2.8 to keep me busy
 

iliakoltsov

Mu-43 Regular
Joined
Aug 7, 2010
Messages
195
Location
Paris
I used to be in Pentax before, I looked at this problem once i moved to M4/3 the rule is simple:

EVERYTHING before FAJ lenses are compatible with M4/3 standard PK mount adapter.

Now AFTER FAJ and INCLUDING FAJ lenses you need a KA adapter (expensive and I do not know if it works well)

Canon switched to electronic aperture pretty much at the start of the EF mount. So i do not know how to mount it as i never owned a canon.

Nikon i have personnaly no idea.
 
Links on this page may be to our affiliates. Sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
Mu-43 is a fan site and not associated with Olympus, Panasonic, or other manufacturers mentioned on this site.
Forum post reactions by Twemoji: https://github.com/twitter/twemoji
Copyright © 2009-2019 Amin Forums, LLC
Top Bottom