dko22
Mu-43 Regular
It's getting ever closer to the time for me to get my first camera with a video facility. From the G1, the GH2 would be the obvious upgrade. The thing is, GH1 bodies can now be bought for about £300 and there is something of a temptation to spend this now and perhaps skip one generation until the GH3. I know the difference in features and everything seems to favour the newer camera. However, purely on the basis of stills IQ, how much difference is there between the GH1 and GH2, particularly at high ISO. Raw only --I want to eliminate misleading info from jpg processing as I never shoot jpg. After all, if you believe DxO, the GH1 is actually better though most reviewers seem to take the opposite view. And from anyone who has owned or extensively used all three cameras, is the GH1 closer in IQ to to the GH2 or G1?
thanks,
David
thanks,
David