Has anyone who's made the switch between both lenses noticed that one's pictures are noticeably more resolving or better than othe other? I can purchase both lenses for about the same price, and I've been looking at photos and reviews with both. For some reason, I get the impression that the 12-40mm has considerably higher clarity in spite of both lenses being just as sharp, on paper. The issue is further compounded because I have no cameras with 5-axis IBIS... Just an EPL5 and a Lumix G3. If both lenses are 'just as good', then the OIS of the 12-35mm would put it considerably ahead. But it doesn't give me the impression that it's 'just as good', rather the Oly looks considerably more detailed. I'd love to have some feedback on this... Right now I don't feel I could make a decision for either.