No wisdom to disclose here. Just thinking that sometimes comparisons and reviews seem heavily biased against m43. I was just reading about the Nikon 7200 and the review was positive, but within the details were things like C-AF missed on occasion. Max FPS was less than 6. Buffer full in 14 images. Then you read in an e-m1 review that C-AF works best in the "slow" L mode at "just" 6fps and that the buffer fills in "only" 22 images. Then there is the fact that many well regarded enthusiast and entry level DSLRs don't teach e-m1 performance but are cast in the "superior" DSLR category. I know, it's just a review, always take with a grain of salt, but I remember making my buying/platform choice it took a LOT more research than it should have just trying to interpret the inconsistency between facts and opinions. I guess it doesn't matter, bug it bugs be sometimes.