I saw a 14-140 II on offer as an ex-demo, with guarantee, for a very good price. On an impulse, I ordered it. This morning I did some test shots, tripod, f5.6, ISO 200, compared to my 12-32 and 35-100 f4. At 100% there was little in it (though I must confess I'm not a pixel-peeper). At 70mm and above, the 35-100 was a little sharper, but apart from that, I didn't see much difference. I've been very happy with the f4 pair, but I'm sorely tempted to sell them, which would recoup the cost of the 14-140. Most of my photos are taken with my 15mm f1.7, head shots with the 42.5 f1.7, but the superzoom would be great for travel and those occasions where you don't want to be swapping lenses. Any input from the mu-43 hive mind?