Anyone know the retail price of the 300mm f4 to be released early in 2015?

Gary Ramey

Mu-43 Veteran
Joined
Dec 27, 2012
Messages
240
Location
Aurora Colorado
Gotta start pinching the pennies now and wanted to have an idea of what I'm looking at. Here's hoping they're not as proud of that lens as they are their 4/3 primes of that length.
 

nstelemark

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
May 28, 2013
Messages
3,298
Location
Halifax, Nova Scotia Canada
Real Name
Larry
This lens is projected to arrive in FY 2016 which ends early in the calendar year 2016 (March 31). I would expect that the arrival date and any possible price is anyone's guess. I would be surprised if the 300f4 was less than $2000, but you never know, the Canon 300f4 L is $1500 (although it has less "fancy" glass elements than I would expect to see in the Olympus lens).
 

AussiePhil

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
Jun 1, 2014
Messages
2,857
Location
Canberra, ACT, Aust
Real Name
Phil
Considering you would need to buy a 600mm F4 lens in the canika world to get the same FOV or AOV. With these being well north of 10K olympus could charge who knows what......... 2000 would be a bargain.
 

Gary Ramey

Mu-43 Veteran
Joined
Dec 27, 2012
Messages
240
Location
Aurora Colorado
This lens is projected to arrive in FY 2016 which ends early in the calendar year 2016 (March 31). I would expect that the arrival date and any possible price is anyone's guess. I would be surprised if the 300f4 was less than $2000, but you never know, the Canon 300f4 L is $1500 (although it has less "fancy" glass elements than I would expect to see in the Olympus lens).
Olympus Americas site is still quoting q1 2015.
 

Gary Ramey

Mu-43 Veteran
Joined
Dec 27, 2012
Messages
240
Location
Aurora Colorado
Considering you would need to buy a 600mm F4 lens in the canika world to get the same FOV or AOV. With these being well north of 10K olympus could charge who knows what......... 2000 would be a bargain.
I was thinking $2500.... But maybe that is optimistic. I do know with the very nice Canikon adapters available for M43 would make anything too expensive a no-go for me
 

Gary Ramey

Mu-43 Veteran
Joined
Dec 27, 2012
Messages
240
Location
Aurora Colorado

kevinparis

Cantankerous Scotsman
Joined
Feb 12, 2010
Messages
3,911
Location
Gent, Belgium
Olympus's financial year runs from March to March... so their internal "2015" doesn't start till next April 1st

my guess on price would be in the 1500 US dollar range... but thats just a pure guess based on thats what canon and nikon charge for a 300/4

could be a very fine lens if you are into sports or wildlife

K
 

Fri13

Mu-43 Veteran
Joined
Jan 30, 2014
Messages
359
Olympus's financial year runs from March to March... so their internal "2015" doesn't start till next April 1st

my guess on price would be in the 1500 US dollar range... but thats just a pure guess based on thats what canon and nikon charge for a 300/4

could be a very fine lens if you are into sports or wildlife

K
Good for sports if you have two bodies. That is the thing what amaze me is Olympus couldn't do it to be 150-300mm f/2.8-4 zoom. But being prime must give extra quality sport/wildlife shooters will love.

But difference between 150mm and 300mm isn't so much, but sometimes 300mm is just too much, especially in wild life. But two bodies then is perfect, other with 300mm and other 40-150mm.

Just dreaming to get to safari again when that beast comes out.
 

JudyM

Mu-43 All-Pro
Joined
May 5, 2010
Messages
1,363
Location
Westminster, MD
Many of us have waited a long time for this lens, myself included. For birds, wildlife and some kinds of sports, 300mm really isn't too long. It will actually be right in the range of the most often used focal lengths for these types of photography. Visit the Canon forum, POTN, and you'll find that most full frame users are normally working with 500-600mm lenses. When I use the Pan. 100-300mm, it's almost always at 300mm. I regularly use my EF 400mm f5.6L for birds now, for an equivalent of 800mm. For small birds and skittish animals, it's hard to go too long. That doesn't mean that a shorter lens wouldn't also be useful, it would be, but Olympus has to start rounding out the long end of the lens lineup somewhere. This is a great place to start.
 

nstelemark

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
May 28, 2013
Messages
3,298
Location
Halifax, Nova Scotia Canada
Real Name
Larry
Olympus's financial year runs from March to March... so their internal "2015" doesn't start till next April 1st

my guess on price would be in the 1500 US dollar range... but thats just a pure guess based on thats what canon and nikon charge for a 300/4

could be a very fine lens if you are into sports or wildlife

K
According to their website FY2014 ended march 2014. I've always found this confusing. So they are in FY2015 now and early calendar year 2016 is the last quarter in the 2016 FY.

Not that I think any of this matters. They will release it when they are ready or not.
 

nstelemark

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
May 28, 2013
Messages
3,298
Location
Halifax, Nova Scotia Canada
Real Name
Larry
Many of us have waited a long time for this lens, myself included. For birds, wildlife and some kinds of sports, 300mm really isn't too long. It will actually be right in the range of the most often used focal lengths for these types of photography. Visit the Canon forum, POTN, and you'll find that most full frame users are normally working with 500-600mm lenses. When I use the Pan. 100-300mm, it's almost always at 300mm. I regularly use my EF 400mm f5.6L for birds now, for an equivalent of 800mm. For small birds and skittish animals, it's hard to go too long. That doesn't mean that a shorter lens wouldn't also be useful, it would be, but Olympus has to start rounding out the long end of the lens lineup somewhere. This is a great place to start.
I have been having a lot of success with the 150f2+ECs. It gives me:

150f2
210f2.8
300f4

In a relatively compact package.
 

JudyM

Mu-43 All-Pro
Joined
May 5, 2010
Messages
1,363
Location
Westminster, MD
I have been having a lot of success with the 150f2+ECs. It gives me:

150f2
210f2.8
300f4

In a relatively compact package.
That's certainly an option. I've seen photos taken with the 150f2 and EC's, and they were very, very good. It's a beautiful lens.
 

nstelemark

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
May 28, 2013
Messages
3,298
Location
Halifax, Nova Scotia Canada
Real Name
Larry
That's certainly an option. I've seen photos taken with the 150f2 and EC's, and they were very, very good. It's a beautiful lens.
150f2+EC20 @300 f4 1/1250 (E-M1)

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)
 

nstelemark

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
May 28, 2013
Messages
3,298
Location
Halifax, Nova Scotia Canada
Real Name
Larry
Great shot! At first I thought the splash on the tree line was dust on my monitor. ;)
:biggrin: Water droplets from the bow paddler's right blade when it was in the air. They call the K2s and K4s splash and dash for a reason! Looking down the course at the start (1000m away) all you can see from the K2s and K4s is a whole line of water in the air, the boats are pretty much hidden. Some more here:

Paddling Pictures
 

Leif

Mu-43 Regular
Joined
Sep 28, 2012
Messages
98
Location
Germany
Real Name
Leif
Good for sports if you have two bodies. That is the thing what amaze me is Olympus couldn't do it to be 150-300mm f/2.8-4 zoom. But being prime must give extra quality sport/wildlife shooters will love.

But difference between 150mm and 300mm isn't so much, but sometimes 300mm is just too much, especially in wild life. But two bodies then is perfect, other with 300mm and other 40-150mm.

Just dreaming to get to safari again when that beast comes out.
As a prime it should also deliver much better results with the rumored 1.4x teleconverter.
 
Top Bottom