The Zeiss Biotar 75mm f1.5 is super swirly and super expensive. The Russsian Cyclop 85mm f1.5 is cheaper and very swirly but has no diaphragm (I believe it's originally for night vision) so it's permanently wide-open. It is M42 mount and I think it's optical design is based on that of the Biotar 75mm.
(Edit: The Helios 40-2 is same as the Cyclop but is a conventional camera lens and has a diaphragm. They're still available new.)
There's also the Biotar 58mm f2 upon which the Helios 44 is based, but it's obviously more expensive.
I've also got a Haiou-64 58mm f2 which is a Chinese Helios 44 copy with Minolta SR/MD mount which can also sometimes do swirly. Mine seems swirlier than my Helios 44-2 and sharper in the centre wide open.
It might be that it's harder to get the swirl on a crop sensor (I suppose because we're cropping out the swirliest bits) but on my Helios and the Haiou you have to work pretty hard to get decent swirl. I can't yet do it reliably on either lens. It's still a bit of trial and error.
Here's one with a little swirl from the Haiou 64:
P9213971 by
Ed Herridge, on Flickr