Any Panasonic Lens Roadmap Updates?

DaveEP

Mu-43 Top Veteran
Joined
Sep 20, 2014
Messages
912
As I move more in to M43 and away from DSLRs one of the things I'm most wanting to see is a fast / wide prime. The latest roadmap from Panasonic I saw seems to be pretty much complete. Is there a new one around?

I know that Oly has the 12mm f2.0, but really it's not 'that' wide and not 'that' fast.

Voigtländer have announced the 10.5mm f0.95, which is great, and with it's 72mm ring we know fast (f0.95) can be done without being too big.

What I'd really like is a 10mm f1.2 from Panasonic / Leica, with AF of course :)

Hmmmm...... I wonder if anyone in Japan is reading this....... hint hint ;)
 

Al.

Mu-43 Veteran
Joined
Jul 3, 2010
Messages
372
Location
Hull, East Yorkshire, UK
Real Name
Alan
Cannot understand why you would want a 10mm f1.2, think it would be impossible to make it without the front element as big as a dinner plate. I would be happy with a 10mm f2.8 and not that fussed on auto focus as there would be plenty of depth of field.
 

bartjeej

Mu-43 Regular
Joined
Oct 9, 2012
Messages
50
I fully agree with you Dave! If it were compact(ish) and weathersealed I'd buy it, and a m43 body to go along with it, right away.

Alan: fast superwides can be very useful for astrophotography, or for creating shallow DOF; don't let anyone tell you that wide-angles don't do bokeh. One of the most common uses for wide angle lenses is to get closer to your subject to create dramatic compositions; this shorter subject distance gains you about as much in DOF control as you gave up by going to wider angles. So in those cases, having a nice fast lens gives you more creative options. And that's also why AF on wide angles is just as useful as on longer lenses. Same goes for image stabilization by the way, but hardly any manufacturer seems to understand that. One more reason to love Olympus bodies...
 

DaveEP

Mu-43 Top Veteran
Joined
Sep 20, 2014
Messages
912
Cannot understand why you would want a 10mm f1.2, think it would be impossible to make it without the front element as big as a dinner plate. I would be happy with a 10mm f2.8 and not that fussed on auto focus as there would be plenty of depth of field.
Given that the 10.5mm f0.95 is not a dinner plate (it's only 72mm), what makes you think an f1.2 would be? I don't see your reasoning for it.

In addition to the uses bartjeej mentions, I'm often needing to shoot inside venues with poor lighting, unable to use flash, unable to use a tripod, but still need a good wide angle POV. The DOF from even f1.2 will be great enough to make very useful pictures, something I may be totally unable to get with f2.8 because I'd have to bump the ISO too much.
 

val

Mu-43 Top Veteran
Joined
Dec 19, 2013
Messages
548
Location
Australia
Real Name
William
The widest brightest lens that Panasonic have is the 10.9mm F1.7 on the LX100.

I'd love to see them bring that to M43, I'm somewhat reminded of the Fuji X100 where they were a bit hesitant at first to make the 23mm F1.4 because they didn't want to initially cannibalize X100/S sales.
 

T N Args

Agent Photocateur
Joined
Dec 3, 2013
Messages
3,471
Location
Adelaide, Australia
Real Name
call me Arg
I'm still waiting for a premium telephoto Lumix lens. With the GH4 having DFD fast continuous AF and high frame rate shooting, we need a telephoto to match, both in speed and quality.

Surely Panasonic realize this?
 

hoodlum

Mu-43 Veteran
Joined
Jul 16, 2012
Messages
363
Location
Toronto Canada
I'm still waiting for a premium telephoto Lumix lens. With the GH4 having DSD fast continuous AF and high frame rate shooting, we need a telephoto to match, both in speed and quality.

Surely Panasonic realize this?
Unfortunately they do not. They killed development of the long fast telephoto zoom as they felt there was no market for it.
 

broody

Mu-43 Veteran
Joined
Sep 8, 2013
Messages
388
I'm still waiting for a premium telephoto Lumix lens. With the GH4 having DFD fast continuous AF and high frame rate shooting, we need a telephoto to match, both in speed and quality.

Surely Panasonic realize this?
This. Panasonic really needs a high-end lens longer than 100mm. There is lots of untapped potential with the GH4 as the 100-300mm isn't really fast-focusing enough for action photography, DFD or not. A new, premium 100-300mm F/4 would simply be awesome and a great answer to the new Olys.
 

Edmunds

Mu-43 Regular
Joined
Oct 16, 2012
Messages
173
As I move more in to M43 and away from DSLRs one of the things I'm most wanting to see is a fast / wide prime. The latest roadmap from Panasonic I saw seems to be pretty much complete. Is there a new one around?

I know that Oly has the 12mm f2.0, but really it's not 'that' wide and not 'that' fast.

Voigtländer have announced the 10.5mm f0.95, which is great, and with it's 72mm ring we know fast (f0.95) can be done without being too big.

What I'd really like is a 10mm f1.2 from Panasonic / Leica, with AF of course :)

Hmmmm...... I wonder if anyone in Japan is reading this....... hint hint ;)
Manual focusing at wide angles is very easy, so I think the Voigtlander already solves your needs

But they didn't kill the 150/2.8. Although it got removed from the 2014 calendar.
I don't really think Panasonic will ever come out and say "we killed it". Removing it from the lens roadmap is already good enough to know they were thinking.

You can say Panasonic didn't kill it, because Olympus did. The reality is lens size is mostly determined by the longest focal length and aperture. A 150mm f/2.8 prime wouldn't be much smaller than the upcoming Olympus 40-150mm f/2.8, which is apparently really excellent at 150mm f/2.8 (as good as the 150mm f/2.0 prime) and has a price tag of only $1500 and already has a purpose built teleconverter.
 

xdayv

Color Blind
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
3,490
Location
Tacloban City, Philippines
Real Name
Dave
A choice I don't get at all. I would love a 90 or 100mm macro. I would love a fast super-wide, and I would love a high quality Tele zoom/prime w/OIS. A 30mm macro, no thanks.
My favorite macro lens on the Nikon FF is the 60mm 2.8 AFS (which I still have). So I think a 30mm macro is nice addition to the system!
 

T N Args

Agent Photocateur
Joined
Dec 3, 2013
Messages
3,471
Location
Adelaide, Australia
Real Name
call me Arg
Panasonic *still* need that tele prime lens

I don't really think Panasonic will ever come out and say "we killed it". Removing it from the lens roadmap is already good enough to know they were thinking.
Well they *did* come out and say no to a big tele zoom. It was a roadmap of lenses for 2014 release. ALL lenses that they are going to release next year were not on it. Whatever they are.

You can say Panasonic didn't kill it, because Olympus did. The reality is lens size is mostly determined by the longest focal length and aperture. A 150mm f/2.8 prime wouldn't be much smaller than the upcoming Olympus 40-150mm f/2.8, which is apparently really excellent at 150mm f/2.8 (as good as the 150mm f/2.0 prime) and has a price tag of only $1500 and already has a purpose built teleconverter.
Not. At. All.

Although the fatty lard like 40-150 Oly is of some use to Panasonic owners, not many of them would be happy to have a 300mm equivalent lens with no IS.

Canon make a 135mm f/2.8 that weighs 390g and has a full frame image circle, and a 135mm f/2 L and 200mm f/2.8 L both at 750g. I reckon Panasonic can deliver something much in the middle. Primes are shorter too, or can be. The Canon 70-200mm f/2.8 is nearly 200mm long, but their 200mm f/2.8 L prime is only 135mm long.

A Panasonic 150/2.8 OIS weighing 500-600g (vs 900g Oly) and 110-120mm long (vs 160mm Oly) would be manna from heaven, and about 100x more desirable to Panasonic camera owners than the new Oly.

C'mon boys.
 

nstelemark

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
May 28, 2013
Messages
3,309
Location
Halifax, Nova Scotia Canada
Real Name
Larry
A 150mm f/2.8 prime wouldn't be much smaller than the upcoming Olympus 40-150mm f/2.8, which is apparently really excellent at 150mm f/2.8 (as good as the 150mm f/2.0 prime) and has a price tag of only $1500 and already has a purpose built teleconverter.
The SLR gear testing of all the Olympus SHG lenses was with the Oly E410 body. If you look at some comparisons the Panny 12-35 is significantly better than the 14-35f2 (which I can say with confidence it is not), so this makes the conclusion that the 40-150 is better than the 150f2 not likely.

A 150f2.8 prime would be a nice addition to the m43 lens collection, I hope that this lens actually sees the light of day.
 

Turbofrog

Mu-43 Legend
Joined
Mar 21, 2014
Messages
5,353
A choice I don't get at all. I would love a 90 or 100mm macro. I would love a fast super-wide, and I would love a high quality Tele zoom/prime w/OIS. A 30mm macro, no thanks.
I also think a longer macro would be nice, but given that the 30mm is going to be sized for the tiny GM-line, it's likely more intended as a walk-about companion than a serious macro machine. Hopefully the price reflects that. It needs to be comfortably cheaper than the Olympus 60mm macro...
 
Links on this page may be to our affiliates. Sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
Mu-43 is a fan site and not associated with Olympus, Panasonic, or other manufacturers mentioned on this site.
Forum post reactions by Twemoji: https://github.com/twitter/twemoji
Copyright © 2009-2019 Amin Forums, LLC
Top Bottom