Any Need for 75m After 35-100m

Discussion in 'Native Lenses' started by aukirk, Apr 27, 2013.

  1. aukirk

    aukirk Mu-43 Regular

    185
    Sep 9, 2012
    Since getting the Pany 35-100, I have found myself never taking the 75m (or 45m for that matter) with me.

    Today I decided to take the 75 in one pocket, 45 in the other and started the day with the 25 mounted. After spending some time with all three lenses, I think I have very little use for the 75.

    Although it has great build quality and delivers beautiful results, I just don't know if I am going to bring it out with me instead of the 35-100. Both are relatively 'big' when stuffed into cargo pockets. Unless I am shooting inside in a dark area, I just don't know I would pull it out?

    I think the 45m has a place, as it is so small you don't notice it in the pocket and it is a great portrait and inside lens. However, I think I am falling out of love with the 75.

    I have been using nearly exclusively prime lens over the past year since renewing my interest in photography and I had very little interest in even getting a zoom. However, after having the 35-100 for a few weeks I find it is on the camera more and more. Part of me feels like that is a bad thing.
     
  2. mattia

    mattia Mu-43 Hall of Famer

    May 3, 2012
    The Netherlands
    matter of taste. For me, with the Canon 'equivalent' setup (135L and a 70-200/2.8), I sold off the zoom. Despite the fact the IS and range made it more flexible in most settings, I just far preferred working with and the results of the 135L (still do).

    Matter of taste.
     
  3. jnewell

    jnewell Mu-43 All-Pro

    Jun 23, 2011
    Boston, MA
    I have the two Panasonic zooms and the 45/1.8 and 75/1.8 Olympus primes. The justification (if there is one) is the ~1 stop greater speed and subject isolation. I admit that's somewhat marginal for most of us.
     
  4. MrKal_El

    MrKal_El Mu-43 Top Veteran

    661
    Mar 24, 2011
    To be honest...2 weeks ago when I finally took out my still-in-the-box 35-100mm and took some portraits..I could not believe the creamy bokeh I was getting with this lens. Really REALLY impressed me.
     
  5. Savas K

    Savas K Mu-43 Top Veteran

    784
    Jan 10, 2013
    Tonight, I just came back from a dimly lit comedy club where the 75mm did the trick. It's so sweet. It is a lens I second guess from time to time, toying with what else I could get with the money I sell it for, but it keeps proving useful.
     
  6. ~tc~

    ~tc~ Mu-43 Hall of Famer

    Oct 22, 2010
    Houston, TX
    f/2.8 to f/1.8 is closer to 2 stops than 1, however at 45 mm, the DOF difference is pretty minimal.
     
  7. yekimrd

    yekimrd Mu-43 All-Pro

    Jun 14, 2012
    Cincinnati, OH
    Mikey
    I second this motion. Other than the versatility that the 35-100mm provides, I didn't see how I could have both in my kit so I sold it within a week of procuring it. It does provide creamy enough bokeh with the the keyword here being "enough" (i.e. nowhere near as magical as with the 75/1.8). When Oly comes out with a f/2.8 zoom that has a further reach, I'll buy that.
     
  8. GaryAyala

    GaryAyala Mu-43 Legend

    Jan 2, 2011
    SoCal
    It is all a matter of personal and of what and how you shoot. I have both and I'm keeping both, but the zoom sees a lot more time on the camera. If the 75mm was a 90mm or 100mm or if I shot a lot of portraits, it would probably be a different story.
     
  9. napilopez

    napilopez Contributing Editor

    826
    Feb 21, 2012
    NYC Area
    Napier Lopez
    It's just a matter of taste! I've recently rented the 35-100mm and the 75mm, and I certainly would keep the latter. When using the zoom, I'd often just stick to one focal length and use it as a prime anyway.

    Another factor to consider is how a lens works with the rest of your system and usage. I've been considering selling my 45 and purchasing the 75mm permanently, as the 45 feels a bit closer to my 25mm f1.4 than I'd like. But then there's also that 43mm f1.2 on the way...
     
  10. jnewell

    jnewell Mu-43 All-Pro

    Jun 23, 2011
    Boston, MA
    Actually, it's closer to 1 stop than 2. F/2.8 to f/1.8 is 1 1/3 stop.
     
  11. Savas K

    Savas K Mu-43 Top Veteran

    784
    Jan 10, 2013
    Here's a few from that night, processed in Photoshop B&W with channel mixer.


    p1568400188-4.jpg


    p1568400292-5.jpg


    p1568400374-5.jpg


    p1568400390-4.jpg


    p1568400204-5.jpg
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.