...that finds the design of the E-M10 mark II a tad ugly compared to the E-M10? Thus is not saying the mark II isn't a better camera but if you look at the two side by side the original E-M10 looks better (just aesthetically). Of course how a camera looks has no bearing on its ability to make a great image but the reworked control wheels on the left while undoubtedly more handy sure are ugly and out of scale with the overall design of the body which is lovely. They look like an afterthought. I would imagine they are more comfortable but from an aesthetic standpoint they just look all wrong. The E-M10 and E-M5 are a lot more integrated looking with the overall design IMHO. I suspect with such a small body the temptation is there to make small dials and buttons and from a usability perspective that can be a huge hassle but something about the E-M10 mark II's proportions looks very weird to me. Does it look better in person? Are they so much better ergonomically (I assume they're better)?