1. Welcome to Mu-43.com—a friendly Micro 4/3 camera & photography discussion forum!

    If you are thinking of buying a camera or need help with your photos, you will find our forum members full of advice! Click here to join for free!

Albinar MC Zoom Macro 1:3.9 80 - 200 MM Lens

Discussion in 'Adapted Lenses' started by tkc9789, Apr 5, 2014.

  1. tkc9789

    tkc9789 Mu-43 Top Veteran

    Dec 8, 2013
    DFW, TX
    I'm thinking about getting an Albinar MC Zoom Macro 1:3.9 80-200 MM Lens as a cheap way to cover the long zoom. Is this something worth buying?
  2. verbatimium

    verbatimium Mu-43 Veteran

    Jul 17, 2013
    Toronto, Ontario
    I don't have any experience with that particular lens but in general, zoom legacy lenses are big, heavy, bulky, a pain to use, and offer subpar image quality. If you are going to use this lens on an Oly camera, you have to manually set your image stabilization for the focal length you are shooting at. So if you change focal length, you have the manually change your image stabilization every time. I have had some nice results with legacy prime lenses, but never legacy zoom lenses.
  3. tjdean01

    tjdean01 Mu-43 Top Veteran

    Feb 20, 2013
    I have the Oly 40-150 which is good, small, and light. I'm actually planning on buying an old zoom lens--Vivitar 70-210 f2.8-4--to play with it. I'm not going to use IBIS, but I'm just curious how it will look and feel. It's HUGE but for some reason I want it. $150. I'd say for most people it's easier to get the 40-150. Or you could buy a 135/3.5 from many makers for a good $50.
  4. HarryS

    HarryS Mu-43 Top Veteran

    Jun 23, 2012
    Midwest, USA
    There are three of these Albinar zooms currently on the Goodwill auction site asking $9.99 with no bids, like this one in Texas. It looks like an FD mount to me. You could probably get it for $16.50 with shipping. Is it worth it? Not to me. I want to pay $7 shipped. That's what my Tou 80-200 zoom cost me, and I'll never buy another lens like it,

    These old zooms are heavy, tricky to focus, and kind of soft with low contrast. With post processing, you can make a decent picture with one. If you browse the Goodwill lenses, there's a lot of 70-210's and 80-200's around $5 or $10 with no bids.

    There's one sample of the 80-200 Albinar in the lens archive.
  5. Cruzan80

    Cruzan80 Mu-43 All-Pro

    Aug 23, 2012
    Denver, Co
    Sean Rastsmith
    If it is the same as the JCPenny rebranded one I have (guessing due to the constant 3.9 aperture) it is actually fairly sharp for what it offers. Heavy, push-pull zoom with refocusing after zoom, but it has a 1:5 close focus option, and is there for when I need the distance. Not soemthing I would spend a lot on, but useful for the occasional need.
  6. tjdean01

    tjdean01 Mu-43 Top Veteran

    Feb 20, 2013
    I looked through my photos and I found that one of the old zooms I once had was an Albinar 80-200. It was total garbage. I wouldn't pay $5 for it. I'll show you a pic. I don't even know if this was wide open. Pretty bad though

    Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)
  7. tkc9789

    tkc9789 Mu-43 Top Veteran

    Dec 8, 2013
    DFW, TX
    Thank you all for your advise. I don't think the Albinar zoom is for me. Is there a good tele legacy glass that's not bulky and heavy that you would recommend?
  8. mr_botak

    mr_botak Mu-43 Veteran

    Dec 4, 2011
    Reading, UK
    OM 3.5/135 is cheap and good, 5/200 also light and long.
    • Like Like x 1
  9. tkc9789

    tkc9789 Mu-43 Top Veteran

    Dec 8, 2013
    DFW, TX
    What about the idea of getting a Panasonic FZ200 as a second camera for long zoom? Tell me I'm crazy.....
  10. tjdean01

    tjdean01 Mu-43 Top Veteran

    Feb 20, 2013
    I bought a Pentax Q. $100 new. Crop factor of 5.6x!
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.