AirShow = E-M1 + ZD 50-200 SWD + 1.4x TC

OzRay

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
Jan 29, 2010
Messages
4,991
Location
South Gippsland, Australia
Real Name
Ray, not Oz
I've always said that the 50-200mm lens, especially in competent hands, is an extremely good lens and you've certainly proven that to be true.
 

denniscloutier

Mu-43 Veteran
Joined
Dec 24, 2011
Messages
255
Location
North Saanich, B.C.
Nice!

I own the 2x TC and I haven't found that it works all that well with the 50-200 (non SWD in my case). I think maybe f7 is just too dark for the autofocus to work really well. Of course technique may also have something to do with it. I'm debating whether to try the 1.4x TC, or just hold out for the 300 f4 & TC.
 

OzRay

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
Jan 29, 2010
Messages
4,991
Location
South Gippsland, Australia
Real Name
Ray, not Oz
I used the 50-200mm with the EC-14 extensively many years ago and it worked quite well (in bright conditions). The focus accuracy and speed is dependent on the aperture and the EC-20 can have a dramatic effect on AF with slower lenses.
 

penfan2010

Mu-43 All-Pro
Joined
Nov 12, 2010
Messages
1,098
Location
NJ, USA
Ronnie -thanks for sharing your experiences in a lot of detail. Despite having a 75-300 mk II and also being quite happy with it, I also just got a 50-200 SWD for the same reason you did, e.g. lower-light, all-weather shooting and the need for much sharper images on the long end of the lens. i have not gotten an E-M1 yet, so have had to contend with a fair bit of hunting on the E-m5, but I am still very happy with the results. Your images of the Blue Angles and the F4U are great, BTW. I do love aviation and air show photography as well, but thought the SWD might be too bulky and heavy to carry around all day . I never had a big DSLR, used Olympus 4/3 before shifting to m4/3, so i never had any real basis for comparison. i brought the SWD out for a morning of bird photography and was really tired afterwards. At any rate, I can't wait for the warm weather again so I can take photos when the air shows start up in the Northeast. Look forward to seeing more of your photos.

Ed
 

Holoholo55

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
Aug 13, 2014
Messages
2,868
Location
Honolulu, HI
Real Name
Walter
Thanks, Ronnie. The photos are great, and the tips just as useful. I had a hard time shooting a recent Blue Angels airshow, and could have used some of those tips.
 

Speedliner

Mu-43 Hall of Famer
Joined
Mar 2, 2015
Messages
2,666
Location
Southern NJ, USA
Real Name
Rob
There's a discussion of that in here.

One of my interests too. Anxious to hear how the 50-200 performs

Fwiw. I think I've heard 160th to 320th.
 

faithblinded

Mu-43 Top Veteran
Joined
Nov 25, 2014
Messages
947
Location
Cleveland, OH
Real Name
Ken
Ok darnit. Our airshow is Sunday, and you've convinced me I should go. If nothing else, it's always good practice for BiF, and general panning. Now, do I take the monster and tripod, or just the 40-150 and em1...?
 

Phocal

Mu-43 Legend
Joined
Jan 3, 2014
Messages
5,157
Location
Houston
I forgot to add............I think for most airshows something around the equivalent of a 100-400 would be about perfect and would still allow handholding without to much effort.
 
Links on this page may be to our affiliates. Sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
Mu-43 is a fan site and not associated with Olympus, Panasonic, or other manufacturers mentioned on this site.
Forum post reactions by Twemoji: https://github.com/twitter/twemoji
Copyright © 2009-2019 Amin Forums, LLC
Top Bottom