1. Welcome to Mu-43.com—a friendly Micro 4/3 camera & photography discussion forum!

    If you are thinking of buying a camera or need help with your photos, you will find our forum members full of advice! Click here to join for free!

Advice on GF1 lenses

Discussion in 'Panasonic Cameras' started by EddieF, May 9, 2011.

  1. EddieF

    EddieF New to Mu-43

    2
    May 9, 2011
    Falkirk, Scotland
    Hi Folks
    I am very new to digital photography and haven't done much photography since I stopped using my (4) Pentax SLR's some years back.
    But I have just bought a lovely GF1 with the 20mm lens and I am delighted with the results.
    But I need some advice please on the next step;
    ---- buy the one stop shop 14-140mm telephoto or
    ---- buy the 14-45mm and then the 90-280mm telephoto?

    Camera uses are mostly family shots plus video and for hillwalking, where both landscapes and longer zoom would be desirable.

    Would the 14-140mm be a better option, less weight, no lens switching, silent AF, or does the 2 lens package offer flexibility that outweighs the 14-140mm benefits. The latter is also more expensive!!!

    Many thanks in advance.
     
  2. ~tc~

    ~tc~ Mu-43 Hall of Famer

    Oct 22, 2010
    Houston, TX
    What 90-280? There is no such thing in a native mount ...

    IMHO, I have rarely missed the range "around" the 20. I lived for a long time with the 20 and 45-200 ... of course, since then I have added the 45/2.8 for macro and a 14-50 f/2.5-3.3 "regular" four-thirds lens (with adapter) to hold me over until the "promised" "bright zoom" (rumored to be 12-50) comes out.

    I think I could live quite happily with the 7-14, 20, 45-200 - especially if the 7-14 and 45-200 were reeleased in brighter versions (I think f/2-4 and f/4 fixed, respectively, would be reasonable)
     
  3. stratokaster

    stratokaster Mu-43 All-Pro

    Jan 4, 2011
    Kyiv, Ukraine
    Pavel
    I'd say go for 14-140mm. I have Canon 18-135mm for my work DSLR and it's very convenient. You can use 14-140 for general photography and 20mm in low light situations.
     
  4. EddieF

    EddieF New to Mu-43

    2
    May 9, 2011
    Falkirk, Scotland
     
  5. Lauzers

    Lauzers Mu-43 Regular

    62
    Jan 6, 2011

    I would say the 14-140 will best suit your shooting style.

    For close family shot, the 20mm is a gem, great for low light too. As for your hill walk, you need the wide end for landscape shots, and tele zoom to capture the bird or animal you spotted.

    I was presented with the same problem, however i stared considering the 14-140 when i already had the 14-45. So naturally, i went for the 45-200 purely just to compliment my set.

    Lens changing is also a habit that can be 'learned'. I realised if i can put up with carrying the 14-140, i can have a bag big enough to have 1 more lens in it. Thus it justify my purchase of 45-200, paired with 14-45.

    hope this helps.
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.